1976
DOI: 10.1021/ac50003a016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of elemental area concentration in ultrathin specimens by x-ray microanalysis and atomic absorption spectrophotometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reproducibility of thickness determination was found to be better than + 7O, provided the probe was positioned further than 2 pm from the grid bar (Chandler & Morton, 1976). Fig.…”
Section: Analysis Of An Ultrathin Section Containing L O O Concentratmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The reproducibility of thickness determination was found to be better than + 7O, provided the probe was positioned further than 2 pm from the grid bar (Chandler & Morton, 1976). Fig.…”
Section: Analysis Of An Ultrathin Section Containing L O O Concentratmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…White radiation was measured by integration of the energy region 4070-7450 eV and corrections for spurious white radiation from surrounding metal parts (grid bars etc) were made as described by Chandler (1973) and Chandler & Morton (1976).…”
Section: (A) Calibration Standardsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the case of very thin specimens, as used for the transmission electron microscope, however, the analytical technique for bulk specimens cannot be employed simply. Several techniques have been developed primarily for the quantitative determination of elemental concentration in ultrathin specimens (Marshall and Hall, 1968;Namae, 1975;Chandler and Morton, 1976). Marshall and Hall (1968) showed the concentration of an element could be determined by the ratio of the intensity of the characteristic line to that of the continuous radiation from the same analyzing point.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%