2009
DOI: 10.4244/eijv5i5a93
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of haemodynamic significance of intermediate coronary lesions using three-dimensional coronary reconstruction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Three-dimensional angiography has been recently validated [20] and could overcome the main limitations of 2-D angiography such as vessel foreshortening, poor representation of the eccentric lesions according to the projection view, providing more detailed geometric information about coronary artery lesions [21,22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three-dimensional angiography has been recently validated [20] and could overcome the main limitations of 2-D angiography such as vessel foreshortening, poor representation of the eccentric lesions according to the projection view, providing more detailed geometric information about coronary artery lesions [21,22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found significant correlation between FFR and cross-sectional area percentage stenosis (AS) in 3D. Compared with FFR, the 3D AS of 57% had the highest sensitivity and specificity for determining the significance of the lesion [14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Few studies have compared 3D-QCA and FFR in intermediate coronary stenoses [14,15]. Saad et al reported better accuracy of 3D-QCA than 2D-QCA in predicting FFR b 0.75.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This new imaging technique is a computer based algorithm that uses two 2D images to create a three dimensional rendering. It takes a short time to reconstruct images per patient and can be done immediately or at a later period of time with little additional cost ( 22 , 23 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%