2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2018.10.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of most suitable low-emission energy technologies development in Poland using integrated fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results show that hydropower is a suitable RE alternative for electricity production. Moreover, [19] identified the most appropriate low-emission energy technology development in Poland using FAHP and FTOPSIS methodology; their results indicate that solar PV is the most feasible low-emission energy technology for electricity generation. Ren and Sovacool [21] analyzed and ranked the low-carbon energy sources of China using the AHP and TOPSIS methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results show that hydropower is a suitable RE alternative for electricity production. Moreover, [19] identified the most appropriate low-emission energy technology development in Poland using FAHP and FTOPSIS methodology; their results indicate that solar PV is the most feasible low-emission energy technology for electricity generation. Ren and Sovacool [21] analyzed and ranked the low-carbon energy sources of China using the AHP and TOPSIS methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Portfolio of RE sources for accomplishing the 3-E policy goals AHP Taiwan [11] RE and nuclear sources selection for electricity generation AHP Kazakhstan [12] Evaluating and selecting RE sources for electricity generation AHP Algeria [13] RE sources selection for sustainable electricity generation AHP Malaysia [14] Evaluating sustainable energy planning and management Fuzzy AHP India [15] The selection of RE alternatives for electricity production Fuzzy AHP Indonesia [16] Analyzing energy performance for sustainable development AHP-Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) and VlseKriterijumska Optimizcija I Kaompromisno Resenje (VIKOR) Turkey [17] Assessing the RE sources to accomplish policy scenario goals Fuzzy TOPSIS Europe [18] Analyzing and ranking the most efficient low-emission energy technologies Fuzzy AHP-Fuzzy TOPSIS Poland [19] Selection of wind power project locations AHP-Fuzzy TOPSIS Pakistan [20] Ranking the low-carbon energy sources AHP and TOPSIS China [21] Multi-criteria assessment of renewable micro-generation technologies TOPSIS, Evaluation Based on Distance from Average Solution (EDAS) and WASPAS Lithuania [22] It is determined from the literature that MCDA approaches greatly help in addressing and assessing sustainable energy planning problems. In this study, the fuzzy-based AHP and WASPAS methods have been applied because the fuzzy set theory is a valuable technique that helps in minimizing the uncertainty of the decision problem [23].…”
Section: Research Focus Research Methods Region Referencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This hybrid model requested to define the relative importance of criterions using the fuzzy AHP method, after what implementing of FTOPSIS helped to rank five technologies according to their relative closeness to ideal solution. To measure specific study among other studies, where hybrid methods of FAHP and TOPSIS are used, the results are compared with other research results [24], [30].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHTP) and FTOPSIS MCDM model were made. As a result, regardless of the MCDM method, the situation in Poland remain stablethe best alternative is solar energy, followed by biomass and biogas, wind and nuclear energy in 2018 [24].…”
Section: Polandmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation