2006
DOI: 10.1365/s10337-006-0817-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of Retention Factors of s-Triazines Homologous Series in Water Using a Numerical Method Basing on Ościk's Equation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the method the values of log k org, log k and x org are known (experimentally evaluated) and log k w parameter is determined by numerical fitting to equation 14 to obtain the linearity between the left term denoted as G and x org . We tested numerical method for different groups of substances, using various mobile and stationary phases by thin-layer, overpressured-layer and column reversed-phase chromatography techniques [Janicka, 2003;Janicka et al, 2006;Janicka, 2007) and numerical log k w parameters proved to be very good lipophylicity descriptors linear correlated to experimental and calculated log P values and moreover, in contrary to extrapolated, almost independent of the range of organic modifier concentration in the effluent.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the method the values of log k org, log k and x org are known (experimentally evaluated) and log k w parameter is determined by numerical fitting to equation 14 to obtain the linearity between the left term denoted as G and x org . We tested numerical method for different groups of substances, using various mobile and stationary phases by thin-layer, overpressured-layer and column reversed-phase chromatography techniques [Janicka, 2003;Janicka et al, 2006;Janicka, 2007) and numerical log k w parameters proved to be very good lipophylicity descriptors linear correlated to experimental and calculated log P values and moreover, in contrary to extrapolated, almost independent of the range of organic modifier concentration in the effluent.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of them is linear extrapolation of the relationship between log k and composition of the aqueous mobile phase -volume fraction of the organic modifier in aqueous mobile phase (logk=f(x 1 )). This method is not precise, because the linear relationship between log k values and volume fraction of the organic modifier exist only in limited range (for small concentration of organic modifier the relationships do not exist) [27,28]. Janicka and Kwietniewski show that the Ościk's equation can be used for determination log k w values successfully [27][28][29][30][31].…”
Section: Rm(ex)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method is not precise, because the linear relationship between log k values and volume fraction of the organic modifier exist only in limited range (for small concentration of organic modifier the relationships do not exist) [27,28]. Janicka and Kwietniewski show that the Ościk's equation can be used for determination log k w values successfully [27][28][29][30][31]. Because in literature in QSAR studies log k w are used, the equation 9a can be described as follows: On the basis of the equation 9b and described procedure, log k w values were determined for many groups of the solutes and compared with logP values.…”
Section: Rm(ex)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1,2] Numerous research papers that have been published during the last years confirmed that the lipophilicity has significant impact on toxicity of organic compounds including pesticides and also on their bioaccumulation. [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] The relationship between bioaccumulation coefficient (K d ) of these compounds and partition coefficient (designated, e.g., as K ow or logP) determined by the use of proper method (theoretical or experimental) shows that described lipophilicity may correlate with bioaccumulation profile of pesticides according to Eq. (1):…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%