2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2006.07.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of sulfonamide antibiotics in wastewater: A comparison of solid phase microextraction and solid phase extraction methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
73
1
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 189 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
73
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, SPE cartridges are one-time use only, significantly more solvent is necessary and high volumes of samples are percolated. However, regarding to the sensitivity and precision, SPE was found more sensitive and it showed better accuracy during extraction as well [29,34] which showed the preferable use of SPE for the extraction of complex matrices.…”
Section: Sample Pre-treatment and Extraction Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast, SPE cartridges are one-time use only, significantly more solvent is necessary and high volumes of samples are percolated. However, regarding to the sensitivity and precision, SPE was found more sensitive and it showed better accuracy during extraction as well [29,34] which showed the preferable use of SPE for the extraction of complex matrices.…”
Section: Sample Pre-treatment and Extraction Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…SPE offers some advantages over LLE such as improved selectivity, specificity and reproducibility, lower organic solvent consumption, shorter sample preparation time, and easier operation and the possibility of automation. Solid-phase microextraction (SPME) has been used in some cases [29,34,35].…”
Section: Sample Pre-treatment and Extraction Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations