2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0039-9140(99)00263-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of ultra-micro amounts of sulfur in igneous rocks by spectrofluorimetry using 2-(o-hydroxyphenyl) benzoxazole derivatization and tin(II)-strong phosphoric acid-assisted reduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…117,119), which is likely conservative for our purposes, and explore a range of [S] ig values between 10 and 1000 ppm. This range is meant to be inclusive and encompasses measurements of a wide range of extrusive, plutonic, felsic, and mafic igneous rocks [120][121][122][123][124][125][126][127] . Our preferred estimate for the overall average igneous sulphur content (300 ppm; ref.…”
Section: The Balance Between Igneous and Sedimentary Sulphur Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…117,119), which is likely conservative for our purposes, and explore a range of [S] ig values between 10 and 1000 ppm. This range is meant to be inclusive and encompasses measurements of a wide range of extrusive, plutonic, felsic, and mafic igneous rocks [120][121][122][123][124][125][126][127] . Our preferred estimate for the overall average igneous sulphur content (300 ppm; ref.…”
Section: The Balance Between Igneous and Sedimentary Sulphur Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This aspect is even more relevant in the case of sulfur determination, as the ubiquity of the element, the high volatility of many of its compounds, and the obvious impossibility to use sulfuric acid as reagent to help dissolve the sample, make it difficult to obtain reliable results when digestion approaches are attempted. In particular, the potential for suffering from analyte losses can be very serious, and it is not surprising that protocols for sulfur determination often include many steps (e.g., reduction to hydrogen sulfide, trapping of the latter in a solution by precipitation, and redissolution of the formed compound) to minimize this risk, 14 at the cost of sample throughput.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The drawback of this method is that a huge amount (>0.4 g) of sample was required. Other methods such as X-ray fluorescence (XRF), infrared detection of SO 2 formed after high-temperature combustion, ion chromatography (IC), thermal ionization mass spectrometry (TIMS), or spectrofluorometry have also been applied. However, the first two methods require not only large amounts of samples but also standard materials with accurate sulfur contents, which need to be calibrated by other methods.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%