2015 10th International Conference on Information, Communications and Signal Processing (ICICS) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/icics.2015.7459814
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining mechanical and electromyographical reaction time in a BCI driving fatigue experiment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The studies reveal that there is a link between EMG amplitude and muscle fatigue as the amplitude of EMG signals decreases gradually with fatigue. The analysis of EMG data provided in [90,91,92,93,94] establishes a correlation between muscular fatigue and drowsiness. During muscle contraction, a shift in center frequency component is observed towards the lower spectral band [95,96].…”
Section: Driver-focused Studies and Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The studies reveal that there is a link between EMG amplitude and muscle fatigue as the amplitude of EMG signals decreases gradually with fatigue. The analysis of EMG data provided in [90,91,92,93,94] establishes a correlation between muscular fatigue and drowsiness. During muscle contraction, a shift in center frequency component is observed towards the lower spectral band [95,96].…”
Section: Driver-focused Studies and Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biosignal data-based methods acquire data through wearable devices. Sensors such as electrocardiograms (ECG) [18][19][20], electromyography (EMG) [21][22][23], and electroencephalography (EEG) [24][25][26] are mainly used. Studies that use biosignal data directly represent the body state of the driver, and they also show excellent performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It could be either labeled by raters via observations (Chai et al, 2017) or labeled by scales (Li & Chung, 2015), such as the Wierwille scale (Wierwille & Ellsworth, 1994). It could also be labeled based on driving performance such as reaction time to driving simulation events (Lin et al, 2012;Tan et al, 2015) or lane variability in the driving simulation (Lin et al, 2005a). A third way of labeling is to use the time-on-task factor, whereby the middle or end of the driving simulation is considered fatigued (Zhao et al, 2011b).…”
Section: Challenges Of Fatigue Detection In Drowsy Drivingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the drowsy driving context, the fatigued data is the class of interest and is therefore denoted as the positive class, while alert data is then the negative class. To label alert (negative class) and fatigued (positive class) data from the driving data, many studies have used ratings (Chai et al, 2017;Li & Chung, 2015), driving performance (Lin et al, 2005a;Lin et al, 2012;Tan et al, 2015) or the time-on-task factor (Zhao et al, 2011b). The supervised learning approach is then utilized.…”
Section: Negative-unlabeled Learning In the Drowsy Driving Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%