1995
DOI: 10.1364/ol.20.002396
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determinism and stochasticity of power-dropout events in semiconductor lasers with optical feedback

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
45
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
5
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the noise sources had essentially a Gaussian character, the first and second moments, given respectively by (15) and (16) (20) where and are dimensionless time and spatial coordinates, respectively, and is the speed of light in the medium, we can rewrite (13) as (21) We can further introduce a new variable having the dimension , according to (22) This new variable can be identified as the random noise term in the stochastic rate equation [23] for which the two-time correlation function is given by (23) Substituting from (22) into the equation and normalizing the -function, one obtains the expression (24) By comparing this relation with (16), one can deduce (25) For the realistic set of parameters: the resonant dipole density m , the dipole coupling coefficient Cm which has been calculated taking the exciton Bohr radius of GaAs as a separation between the charges in the dipole, and the dephasing time fs, and for the variance m , we calculate the value for the spontaneous emission rate. This value is in reasonable agreement with the typical values quoted in the literature (see, e.g., [1], [29]). Moreover, considering the advances in the semiconductor laser design to reduce noise, this value can be assumed as realistic.…”
Section: B Langevin Formulation and Fdtd Implementationsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Since the noise sources had essentially a Gaussian character, the first and second moments, given respectively by (15) and (16) (20) where and are dimensionless time and spatial coordinates, respectively, and is the speed of light in the medium, we can rewrite (13) as (21) We can further introduce a new variable having the dimension , according to (22) This new variable can be identified as the random noise term in the stochastic rate equation [23] for which the two-time correlation function is given by (23) Substituting from (22) into the equation and normalizing the -function, one obtains the expression (24) By comparing this relation with (16), one can deduce (25) For the realistic set of parameters: the resonant dipole density m , the dipole coupling coefficient Cm which has been calculated taking the exciton Bohr radius of GaAs as a separation between the charges in the dipole, and the dephasing time fs, and for the variance m , we calculate the value for the spontaneous emission rate. This value is in reasonable agreement with the typical values quoted in the literature (see, e.g., [1], [29]). Moreover, considering the advances in the semiconductor laser design to reduce noise, this value can be assumed as realistic.…”
Section: B Langevin Formulation and Fdtd Implementationsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The role of noise in determining the statistics and the nature of the dropout events has been previously examined in [3,4], but in the present paper we have clarified that the LFF dynamics can be interpreted at a first level of approximation as a biased Brownian motion towards a threshold with a reset mechanism. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…3(a). Note that the dropout events occur more frequently and the intensity shows higher frequency structure in the simulations than that observed in the experiments, which we attribute to our neglect of spontaneous emission in the model [16]. For a modulation strength of 6% (Fig.…”
Section: Theoretical Analysis: Low-frequency Modulationmentioning
confidence: 56%