2019
DOI: 10.1080/02701960.2019.1572006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing an Age-Friendly University (AFU) audit: A pilot study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, these features are not explicitly included in the current AFU principles created by DCU. Specifically, the themes of transportation, safe walking routes, and campus navigation concerns identified by the citizen scientists at the UofM echo several themes identified in previous investigations of university age-friendliness ( Hansen et al, 2019 ; Silverstein et al, 2019 ; Vrkljan et al, 2019 ). In particular, the findings from the UofM directly mirror those identified in Silverstein et al’s AFU audit at the University of Massachusetts Boston, mainly in areas relating to poor signage and campus map placement, parking garage and lot access, and uneven pavement.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Unfortunately, these features are not explicitly included in the current AFU principles created by DCU. Specifically, the themes of transportation, safe walking routes, and campus navigation concerns identified by the citizen scientists at the UofM echo several themes identified in previous investigations of university age-friendliness ( Hansen et al, 2019 ; Silverstein et al, 2019 ; Vrkljan et al, 2019 ). In particular, the findings from the UofM directly mirror those identified in Silverstein et al’s AFU audit at the University of Massachusetts Boston, mainly in areas relating to poor signage and campus map placement, parking garage and lot access, and uneven pavement.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Published accounts of specific institution’s journeys toward adopting DCU’s AFU principles have just recently begun to appear in the literature ( Clark & Leedahl, 2019 ; Luz & Baldwin, 2019 ; Silverstein, Hendricksen, Bowen, Fonte Weaver, & Whitbourne, 2019 ). Luz and Baldwin’ s ( 2019 ) case study, for example, describes Michigan State University’s AgeAlive program and its goal of expanding the institution’s portfolio, communication network, and community partnerships related to aging.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To ensure positive outcomes for construction projects, stakeholders should be understood and managed carefully (Yang et al , 2009). Therefore, stakeholder analysis at projects' briefing stage, which is as an essential component of the stakeholder management process, should be conducted because the decisions made according to the analysis results would profoundly affect the following construction process (Jepsen and Eskerod, 2009; Freeman, 2010; Hu et al , 2015; Silverstein et al , 2019). Mitchell et al (1997) proposed stakeholder theory, which indicates that in the stakeholder analysis, the legitimacy of relationships, urgency of demands and power to influence are considered three important attributes of stakeholders.…”
Section: Overview Of Stakeholders and Cfs In Promoting Afcsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of age inclusivity is only as useful as its application. As our prior research has also shown (Silverstein et al, 2019), institutions may endorse age-inclusive practices in theory but fail to engage in practices that ensure their incorporation into campus life. The purpose of the present study was to examine which strategies can help institutions become more age inclusive not just in theory but also in practice.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%