2020
DOI: 10.1109/access.2019.2961811
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing and Applying Chaotic Harris Hawks Optimization Technique for Extracting Parameters of Several Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell Stacks

Abstract: In this paper, an efficient optimization technique called Chaotic Harris Hawks optimization (CHHO) is proposed and applied for estimating the accurate operating parameters of proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC), which simulate and mimic its electrical performance. The conventional Harris Hawks optimization (HHO) is a recent optimization technique that is based on the hunting approach of Harris hawks. In this proposed optimization technique, ten chaotic functions are applied for tackling with the studied… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
43
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, they used HHO as a local search operator within MVO to solve its local optima problem. Furthermore, in [42], they replaced the random…”
Section: B Chaotic Mapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, they used HHO as a local search operator within MVO to solve its local optima problem. Furthermore, in [42], they replaced the random…”
Section: B Chaotic Mapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 4 presents the approximated value of current and voltage using the BĂ©zier curve method compared with experimental data. The calculated IAE of the BĂ©zier curve, CHHO [49], and MAEO [51] are compared and reported in Table 5. The purpose of the comparison is to validate the accuracy of the proposed technique in the characteristic curves process with other algorithms.…”
Section: Case Study 4: 250 W Pemfc Stackmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To check the efficiency of the used technique and the performance of the obtained results, a statistical analysis is conducted to assess the precision and accuracy of the approximated V-I and P-I curves. The results obtained are compared to latest methods, such as the Whale Optimization Algorithm (WOA) [14], GRG-1 [22], GRG-2 [22], FOA [25], ICA [25], SFLA [25], SMSA [26], SSO [32], Modified Artificial Ecosystem Optimizatio (MAEO) [49], GA [38], MRFO [38], Grouping-based Global Harmony Search GGHS [50], Improved Harmouny Search (HIS) [50], Particle Swarm Optimization with adaptive inertia Weight (PSO-w) [50], and Chaotic Harris Hawks Optimization (CHHO) [51]. To evaluate the performance of the proposed method, various error parameters are computed, examined, and compared, such as Individual Absolute Error (IAE), Relative Error (RE), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Mean Bias Error (MBE), and Autocorrelation Function (ACF).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The differential evaluation (DE), as well as the hybrid adaptive differential evaluation (HADE) algorithms, have been introduced for solving the optimization problem presented in [22], [23]. More recent optimization methods have been applied to solve the problem of PEMFC's parameter such as: the harmony search algorithm (HAS) [24], the seeker optimization algorithm (SOA) [25], the multi-verse optimizer (MVO) [26], the adaptive RNA genetic algorithm [27], Eagle strategy based on JAYA algorithm and Nelder-Mead simplex method (JAYA-Tree Growth Algorithm for Parameter Identification of Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell Models NM) [28], grey wolf optimizer (GWO) [29], hybrid Teaching Learning Based Optimization -Differential Evolution algorithm (TLBO-DE) [30], shark smell optimizer (SSO) [25], Cuckoo search algorithm with explosion operator (CS-EO) [31], selective hybrid stochastic strategy [32], bird mating optimizer [33], grasshopper optimizer (GHO) [34], Chaotic Harris Hawks optimization (CHHO) [35], and Modified Artificial Ecosystem Optimization (MAEO) [36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%