1962
DOI: 10.2307/1169202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and Application of Tests of Educational Achievement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1968
1968
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The contradiction is a real one, despite a conceptualization that the distinction between achievement and aptitude tests is unclear (e.g., Anastasi, 1974;Merwin & Gardner, 1962;Schmeiser & Welch, 2006;Zwick, 2006). Modern theorists recognize aptitude as a product of interest, motivation, affect, the specific environment, intelligence, metacognitive abilities, and academic experiences (Corno et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The contradiction is a real one, despite a conceptualization that the distinction between achievement and aptitude tests is unclear (e.g., Anastasi, 1974;Merwin & Gardner, 1962;Schmeiser & Welch, 2006;Zwick, 2006). Modern theorists recognize aptitude as a product of interest, motivation, affect, the specific environment, intelligence, metacognitive abilities, and academic experiences (Corno et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present Es are aware of a widespread clinical intuition that personality testing could at times generate "too much" anxiety. A review of the literature revealed research investigating the effect of anxiety on the test being given (Ellis, 1946;Merwin & Gardner, 1962;Sarason, Hill, & Zimbardo, 1964;Sarason & Koenig, 1965). However, little research has focused attention on anxiety produced as a function of the particular test being given.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%