2017
DOI: 10.21861/hgg.2016.78.02.01
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and Contemporary Characteristics of Agricultural Cooperatives in the Area of Croatia

Abstract: 5U radu je pobliže razmotreno pulsiranje razvoja hrvatskoga zadrugarstva tijekom više od 150 godina duge tradicije njegova djelovanja, recentni razvojni trendovi i prostorno diferencirana razvijenost u suvremenom razdoblju. Rezultati pokazuju da je, unatoč dugoj tradiciji, hrvatsko zadrugarstvo u recentnom razdoblju suočeno s nizom razvojnih problema. Temeljni je uzrok takva stanja neodgovarajuća pravna regulativa -neusklađenost zakona o zadrugama i korelativnih zakona koji su relevantni za funkcioniranje zadr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Modern cooperatives in contemporary Croatia started to develop after the collapse of feudalism in the mid-19 th century. Before that, a type of so-called familial cooperatives existed in Croatia (Pejnović, 2016), but cooperatives in contemporary meaning of that term, started in Croatia on the island of Korčula with a creditsaving cooperative named 'Blagajna uzajamne veresije' 2 which was established in 1864 with the aim to provide a better financial framework for the development of agricultural and craft sector (Mataga, 2005). Cooperative members respected cooperative values and invested agreed amounts of money in their cooperative, which were then used to finance projects of cooperative members mostly in agricultural (fisheries, vineyard and agriculture) and craft sector on the island of Korčula at that time.…”
Section: Social Economymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modern cooperatives in contemporary Croatia started to develop after the collapse of feudalism in the mid-19 th century. Before that, a type of so-called familial cooperatives existed in Croatia (Pejnović, 2016), but cooperatives in contemporary meaning of that term, started in Croatia on the island of Korčula with a creditsaving cooperative named 'Blagajna uzajamne veresije' 2 which was established in 1864 with the aim to provide a better financial framework for the development of agricultural and craft sector (Mataga, 2005). Cooperative members respected cooperative values and invested agreed amounts of money in their cooperative, which were then used to finance projects of cooperative members mostly in agricultural (fisheries, vineyard and agriculture) and craft sector on the island of Korčula at that time.…”
Section: Social Economymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sharp drop of the number of cooperatives, members, and employees in cooperatives during 2012 is a consequence of harmonising the status of the cooperative sector with the new law, in relation to which half of the total number of cooperatives (2060), registered in 2011, ceased to exist (Stanojević, I.; Volić, B, Interview, as cited in Pejnović et al, 2016).…”
Section: Recentni Razvoj Sektorska Struktura I Regionalne Razlike U mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thereby, their organisational forms changed and adjusted to concrete conditions of different socio-economic systems, from familial or household cooperatives, through fraternities of priests and lay people, to modern agricultural cooperatives in the 19th century (See: Mataga, 2014;Pejnović et al, 2016).…”
Section: Recentni Razvoj Sektorska Struktura I Regionalne Razlike U mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, the two views are very much inter-related, because in order to overcome external obstacles, a co-operative must often have internal strengths, 3 while overcoming internal weaknesses is usually much easier under favorable external conditions. Although there is considerable literature about the Croatian co-operative sector (Cvetko, 1908;Puljiz, 1992;Mataga, 1995Mataga, , 2005Borbaš and Mikšić, 2003;Petak, 2005;Defilippis, 2005;Matijašević, 2005;Tratnik et al, 2007;Babić and Račić, 2011;Golja and Novkovic, 2014;Novkovic and Golja, 2015;Stanojević, 2015;Pejnović et al, 2016;Vidović and Rakin, 2017;Nedanov and Žutinić, 2018;Đurkin Badurina and Kljaić Šebrek, 2018), some of which are actually comprehensive reviews (Mataga, 2009(Mataga, , 2014Pavličević, 2010;Broz and Švaljek, 2019), none of these studies, except our previously mentioned one (Božić et al, 2019), included systematic empirical qualitative research based on interviewing the leaders and members of co-operatives. Studies of co-operative sectors in the countries in Southeast Europe are also mostly reviews (Šoljić et al, 2005;Lambru and Petrescu, 2014;Avsec and Štromajer, 2015;Bojić and Vapa-Tankosić, 2015;Chroneos Krasavac and Petković, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%