2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-1759(02)00166-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and validation of a biosensor-based immunoassay for progesterone in bovine milk

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Simultaneous immobilisation of OA onto all flow cells of the CM5 sensor chip was performed following modifications of a previously described method (Gillis et al, 2002). For covalent immobilisation, carboxyl groups of the sensor surface were activated by derivatisation with NHS mediated by EDC.…”
Section: Immobilisation Of Oa On Cm5 Sensor Chipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simultaneous immobilisation of OA onto all flow cells of the CM5 sensor chip was performed following modifications of a previously described method (Gillis et al, 2002). For covalent immobilisation, carboxyl groups of the sensor surface were activated by derivatisation with NHS mediated by EDC.…”
Section: Immobilisation Of Oa On Cm5 Sensor Chipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This system immobilizes progesterone ex-situ by removing the carboxymethyl dextran coated gold sensing surface from the chip cover and dispensing onto it a solution of 3-carboxymethyloxime derivative outside the SPR instrument. It demonstrated a LOD of 3 ng/mL which was later improved to 0.4 ng/mL in cow’s milk [27,28]. This system uses significant dilution to overcome matrix effects [27,28], which can compromise the overall assay sensitivity.…”
Section: Steroidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With gold nanoparticle enhancement of small molecule SPR immunoassays now well established, it is hoped that it will be successfully applied to an even broader range of compounds. The issue of biofouling in small molecule SPR is also receiving attention but often the techniques used involve total removal of the background matrix by timeconsuming methods such as flow filtering where blockages can occur and LOD are too high (Stevens et al, 2008) or else extensive dilution of samples (Gillis et al, 2002) which worsens the practical LOD. By combining surface and conjugation chemistry with immunology and optics, it is possible to create new sensor interfaces that offer significantly improved detection of small molecules, not only in buffer but also in real biological samples.…”
Section: Context In Wider Plasmonic Biosensor Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%