2019
DOI: 10.1111/jop.12964
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and validation of a short version of Chronic Oral Mucosal Disease Questionnaire (COMDQ‐15)

Abstract: Background:The adoption of the Chronic Oral Mucosal Disease Questionnaire (COMDQ) into clinical practice has been low, despite its rigorous development process. A potential limitation of the COMDQ is the high response burden to patients. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to develop and validate a short version of the 26-item COMDQ. Methods:The COMDQ data of 520 patients with chronic oral mucosal diseases were randomly divided into 2 subsamples. Descriptive item analysis and exploratory factor analysi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
22
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The 15‐item Chronic Oral Mucosal Disease Questionnaire (COMDQ‐15) is a recently developed short version of the original COMDQ‐26 (Wiriyakijja et al., 2020). Similar to its parent version, the COMDQ‐15 assesses four OH‐QoL domains including Physical Discomfort (PD, 5 items), Medication and Treatment (MT, 3 items), Social and Emotional (SE, 5 items) and Patient Support (PS, 2 items).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The 15‐item Chronic Oral Mucosal Disease Questionnaire (COMDQ‐15) is a recently developed short version of the original COMDQ‐26 (Wiriyakijja et al., 2020). Similar to its parent version, the COMDQ‐15 assesses four OH‐QoL domains including Physical Discomfort (PD, 5 items), Medication and Treatment (MT, 3 items), Social and Emotional (SE, 5 items) and Patient Support (PS, 2 items).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Total COMDQ‐15 score is calculated by summation of the responses of all items, giving the possible maximum score of 60. The COMDQ‐15 has good evidence supporting its validity and reliability for use in patients with OLP (Wiriyakijja et al., 2020).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A shortened form of the outcome questionnaires can increase the patient acceptability in routine clinical care and heighten feasibility in clinical trials. 26 In the field of dental literature, some short versions of outcome measures have been introduced to facilitate their use in clinical settings. For example, the original 49 items of the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP) was shortened to a 14-item measure, the original 48 items of the Dentine Hypersensitivity Experience Questionnaire (DHEQ) was shortened to a 15-item measure, and the original 26 items of the Chronic Oral Mucosal Disease Questionnaire (COMDQ) was shortened to a 15item measure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Total COMDQ-26 and COMDQ-15 score are calculated by summation of the responses of all items, giving the possible maximum score of 104 and 60, respectively. Both the original and short version of the COMDQ have good evidence supporting validity and reliability for use in patients with OLP [18,17].…”
Section: Patient-reported Outcome Measuresmentioning
confidence: 93%