Development and validation of a video on bed baths

Abstract

Objective: develop and validate a video on bed bathing directed to nursing professionals and students. Method: the video was based on the literature and presents the definition of bed bath, indications for its performance, steps to perform it, and potential complications. Nursing professors and nurses validated it. They assessed the pertinence of content, clarity, and language of the video scenes. The Delphi Technique was used in this phase. After recording, three nursing professors, along with undergraduate nursing students from a public university, assessed the educational video. The professors first watched the video and suggested changes, and then the students watched the video after the changes were implemented. Results: six rounds were needed for experts to validate the video script using the Delphi Technique. After the video recording, undergraduate students considered the video of easy understanding. Conclusion: the video script was composed of four topics and was validated by experts after six rounds. The video was assessed by the professors and nursing undergraduate students, who considered the topics and the video as a whole as apprehensible. This study is expected to contribute to professional training and improvement of the knowledge and skills of nursing students.

Production and validation of the short film Pés que te quero®: educational technology for people with diabetes

“…Studies point out that the construction of educational videos are good educational resources used by nursing, covering several areas: bed bath techniques (22) , aftercare-surgical procedures (23) , care Concerning the repetition of the scenarios, the changes of locations could compromise the sequence of the scenes. The teams also considered the logistics of the locations as impediments to not making changes in the recording environments.…”

Construction and validation of an instrument for classifying nipple and areola complex lesions resulting from breastfeeding

“…There is no consensus in the literature regarding the number of judges needed for a validation study (22,(35)(36) . A literature review showed that some authors recommend a committee composed of at least 5 and at most 10 professionals with clinical experience in the field and working at the time of the research (22) .…”

“…A literature review showed that some authors recommend a committee composed of at least 5 and at most 10 professionals with clinical experience in the field and working at the time of the research (22) . Some studies that address content validation selected from 5 to 17 experts for the validation stage (29)(30)(31)33,(36)(37) .…”

Construction of an educational booklet for people with asthma

“…In this scenario, health education actions supported by the use of educational technologies that address the concept of the disease, triggering factors, use of medicines and inhalation devices, signs and symptoms, as well as the identification and action in case of an exacerbation 6 are relevant for self-management. These educational technologies can be an effective alternative to support the dissemination of knowledge and autonomy of the person with asthma [7][8] .…”