2018
DOI: 10.1186/s40645-018-0207-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a database and visualization system integrating various models of seismic velocity structure and subducting plate geometry around Japan

Abstract: To estimate strong ground motions caused by future earthquakes in Japan and to more accurately predict seismic hazards and tsunamis, it is necessary to accurately model the geometry of the subducting plate and the seismic velocity structure around Japan, particularly in offshore areas. Although various seismic velocity structure and plate boundary models have been proposed around Japan, they are all managed individually and differ in extent, data type, and format. Ensuring consistency among those models requir… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another example is the Oxford SubMachine , which is a collection of web-based tools for the interactive visualization, analysis, and quantitative comparison of global-scale, volumetric (3-D) data sets of the subsurface, with supporting tools for interacting with other, complementary models and data sets. Other tools, such as Postpischl et al (2011) and Yamagishi et al (2018) use the Keyhole Markup Language (KML) visualization layers (Burggraf, 2015) with the Google Earth geo-browser as a flexible platform that can substitute specialized graphical tools to perform qualitative visual data analyses and comparisons.…”
Section: Sphglltoolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another example is the Oxford SubMachine , which is a collection of web-based tools for the interactive visualization, analysis, and quantitative comparison of global-scale, volumetric (3-D) data sets of the subsurface, with supporting tools for interacting with other, complementary models and data sets. Other tools, such as Postpischl et al (2011) and Yamagishi et al (2018) use the Keyhole Markup Language (KML) visualization layers (Burggraf, 2015) with the Google Earth geo-browser as a flexible platform that can substitute specialized graphical tools to perform qualitative visual data analyses and comparisons.…”
Section: Sphglltoolsmentioning
confidence: 99%