2019
DOI: 10.22146/ijc.34561
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a Graphical User Interface Application to Identify Marginal and Potent Ligands for Estrogen Receptor Alpha

Abstract: Employing ensemble Protein-Ligand Interaction Fingerprints (ensPLIF) as descriptors in post retrospective Structure-Based Virtual Screening (SBVS) campaigns Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship (QSAR) analysis has been proven to significantly increase the predictive ability in the identification of potent ligands for estrogen receptor alpha (ERα). In the research presented in this article, similar approaches have been performed to construct and retrospectively validate an SBVS protocol to identify marg… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These values were equal to inhibition constant (Ki) values in subpicomolar [21] indicating that the pentapeptide AEYTR was a potent AChEI. In vitro tests will be performed as the ultimate confirmation of the in silico results [18,26] and discussed elsewhere.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These values were equal to inhibition constant (Ki) values in subpicomolar [21] indicating that the pentapeptide AEYTR was a potent AChEI. In vitro tests will be performed as the ultimate confirmation of the in silico results [18,26] and discussed elsewhere.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EF and AUC values showed that the virtual screening method using pharmacophore model 2 was an excellent screening model. The EF and AUC values were worse than the SBVS protocol reported by Yuniarti et al [27], but it was still better than the results reported by Setiawati et al [28], and also the EF and AUC values of the SBVS protocol used to identify ligands for ERα in DUD-E (EF = 15.4, AUC = 0.675) [29]. Therefore, the virtual screening of 186 AIACs and AMACs compounds was performed using model 2.…”
Section: Model Preparation and Validationmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The main material for the docking simulations was the crystal structure of the Wild-type PfDHFR complexed with pyrimethamine (PDB:3QGT) [3]. Computation for the docking simulations was performed in the same machine used by Yuniarti et al [14].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%