2019
DOI: 10.1002/bmc.4462
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a high‐performance liquid chromatography method with fluorescence detection for the routine quantification of tamoxifen, endoxifen and 4‐hydroxytamoxifen in plasma from breast cancer patients

Abstract: To date, several methods for the quantification of tamoxifen and its metabolites have been developed, most of which employ liquid chromatography tandem–mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS). These methods are highly sensitive and reproducible, but are also time‐consuming and require expensive equipment; one of their main disadvantages is matrix ionization effects. A more viable option, particularly in developing countries, is high‐performance liquid chromatography coupled with UV or fluorescence detection. We developed… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding chromatography methods, such as liquid, gas, thin layer, and micellar chromatography combined with different detection systems, a number of analytical techniques have been implemented for separating and quantifying TAM and its metabolites [9][10][11][12][13]. Since these compounds are nonvolatile, the use of GC to analyze them requires a derivation step that is extremely time consuming, does not meet the principles of green chemistry, and has not been well received by researchers [10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding chromatography methods, such as liquid, gas, thin layer, and micellar chromatography combined with different detection systems, a number of analytical techniques have been implemented for separating and quantifying TAM and its metabolites [9][10][11][12][13]. Since these compounds are nonvolatile, the use of GC to analyze them requires a derivation step that is extremely time consuming, does not meet the principles of green chemistry, and has not been well received by researchers [10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is an urgent need for a method for the determination of TMX in biological fluids and pharmaceutical samples, which requires the use of advanced analytical instruments. Liquid chromatography (LC) in combination with fluorescence or ultraviolet (UV) detection (Heath et al, 2014; Rangel‐Méndez et al, 2019; Sereshti et al, 2017), gas chromatography in combination with mass spectrometry analytical detection system (GC–MS) (Tauxe‐Wuersch et al, 2006), LC–MS/MS (Yong et al, 2020), GC with flame ionization detection (FID; Rodríguez et al, 2003), capillary electrophoresis (Sanders et al, 1997; Thang et al, 2015, 2016) and spectrophotometry and electrochemical techniques (Ahmed et al, 2020; Khudaish, 2020; Moghaddam et al, 2017; Radhapyari et al, 2013) are among the methods that have been utilized for determination and quantification of TMX. Thus, finding a fast, reliable and reproducible analytical process for ultra‐trace analysis of TMX in biological fluids is of great importance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%