2009
DOI: 10.3327/jnst.46.907
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a Japanese Adult Female Voxel Phantom

Abstract: A Japanese adult female voxel (volume pixel) phantom (JF) was developed using CT images of a healthy female volunteer. The height (152 cm) and weight (44 kg) of JF are smaller than the averages of Japanese adult female. The voxel size of JF is 0:98 Â 0:98 Â 1 mm 3 . Therefore, the shapes of small or complicated organs, such as thyroid and stomach, are distinctly reproduced. The shapes of female-specific organs, such as ovary and uterus, in JF are also realistically represented compared with those of a previous… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Anatomical human phantoms are a key component in dosimetry studies investigating the absorption of electromagnetic fields in the human body in implant safety assessments [Beard et al, 2006;Hand, 2008]. With the exception of a few phantoms based on cryosection images [Ackerman, 1998;Kim et al, 2008], most of the available phantoms were derived from computational tomography or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanning data [Zankl and Petoussi-Henss, 2002;Lee et al, 2004;Dimbylow, 2005;Sato et al, 2007;Zhang et al, 2007;Sato et al, 2009;Christ et al, 2010].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anatomical human phantoms are a key component in dosimetry studies investigating the absorption of electromagnetic fields in the human body in implant safety assessments [Beard et al, 2006;Hand, 2008]. With the exception of a few phantoms based on cryosection images [Ackerman, 1998;Kim et al, 2008], most of the available phantoms were derived from computational tomography or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanning data [Zankl and Petoussi-Henss, 2002;Lee et al, 2004;Dimbylow, 2005;Sato et al, 2007;Zhang et al, 2007;Sato et al, 2009;Christ et al, 2010].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%