2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.pnucene.2017.12.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a subchannel analysis code for SFR wire-wrapped fuel assemblies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specific model for each regime part and dividing criterion between them were also proposed. A sub‐channel code Subchannel Analysis Code (SUBAC) 12 applicable to wire‐spaced assembly was referred in this study.…”
Section: Methods For Improving Simulation Of Inter‐assembly Heat Transfermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specific model for each regime part and dividing criterion between them were also proposed. A sub‐channel code Subchannel Analysis Code (SUBAC) 12 applicable to wire‐spaced assembly was referred in this study.…”
Section: Methods For Improving Simulation Of Inter‐assembly Heat Transfermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results obtained for the high-, medium-, and low-flow-rate validation cases are presented in Figure 11. As in ORNL's 19-pin case, we compared the results obtained with the present code with the ones obtained in the experiments and SUBAC code [35]. We have selected SUBAC for the code-to-code comparison since it is, to our knowledge, the only subchannel code for wirewrapped SFRs, with openly available results, that presented the best agreement between the code predictions and experiment measurements for the current benchmark.…”
Section: Toshiba's 37-pin Benchmarkmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Subchannel efforts are new in Pronghorn when compared to other subchannel codes that have been developed, improved, and validated for many years. Hence, we thought it appropriate to include the results obtained by the SUBAC [35] and MATRA-LMR [36] codes in our comparison against experiments. We have selected these two codes because they have previously presented openly available results for the ORNL 19-pin benchmark and are, to our knowledge, the most developed subchannel codes for LMFRs.…”
Section: The Configuration and External Heat Fluxes Of This Cartridge...mentioning
confidence: 99%