2020
DOI: 10.1109/tie.2019.2934065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a Three-Dimensional Magnetic Equivalent Circuit Model for Axial Flux Machines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
25
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the literature, the MEC approach has the advantage of moderate computational complexity, especially when it is compared to the high accuracy modelling, but the accuracy during transient conditions is limited because it does not usually include distributed circuit effects in the rotor conductor or the stator ring leakage inductance [ 74 , 75 ]. For example, in [ 74 ] the computing complexity is reduced by a single set of equations which includes magnetic and electric equations.…”
Section: Models Based On Magnetic Circuitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to the literature, the MEC approach has the advantage of moderate computational complexity, especially when it is compared to the high accuracy modelling, but the accuracy during transient conditions is limited because it does not usually include distributed circuit effects in the rotor conductor or the stator ring leakage inductance [ 74 , 75 ]. For example, in [ 74 ] the computing complexity is reduced by a single set of equations which includes magnetic and electric equations.…”
Section: Models Based On Magnetic Circuitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, if compared to FEM based, the resulting computation time is much shorter, about 5%. More recently, the work in [ 75 ] reports differences of 70 h for a FEM analysis versus 18 min for the same analysis carried out via MEC approach. The MEC model achieves savings in computational costs of more than 97% when compared with the FEM-based model while keeping good accuracy.…”
Section: Models Based On Magnetic Circuitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Major nonlinear features of electrical machines such as time and space harmonics can be modeled by the MEC method rapidly. Although different types of electrical machines are modeled using the MEC method, this method is applied in few investigations to analyze VR resolvers (Saneie et al , 2017; Alipour-Sarabi et al , 2019; Naderi et al , 2021; Ghandehari et al , 2021). A MEC model of Axial Flux VR (AFVR) resolver is developed in Saneie et al (2017), while the core saturation effect is neglected.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A MEC model of Axial Flux VR (AFVR) resolver is developed in Saneie et al (2017), while the core saturation effect is neglected. In Alipour-Sarabi et al (2019), an AFVR resolver is modeled based on three-dimensional (3D)-MEC under healthy and faulty conditions. Mentioned MEC models use few elements to model the resolver flux paths; therefore, the accuracy of the MEC model in previous references can be improved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All of the aforementioned resolvers supply the excitation winding with AC voltage/current source [7] and as a result, the AC-excited coils of excitation winding produce AC magnetic field which flows into the core of the sensor and induced HF voltage in signal windings. In addition to the radial flux resolvers, axial flux resolvers [9] and linear resolvers [10]- [12] have been investigated. In [13], a new PM-Resolver with permanent magnets (PMs) in its structure investigated which shows that the resolver also can work properly with DC magnetic flux rather than AC magnetic flux.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%