2004
DOI: 10.1002/nem.529
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of e‐government: a STOPE view

Abstract: The transition from conventional government services to e-government services is becoming an international trend in various parts of the world. This transition is useful in two main ways. It provides benefits not only to the government, but also to all organizations and people, contributing to what is now known as the digital economy and the well being of the society. The transition is also an opportunity for the government to reorganize its services and reduce, or even eliminate, unnecessary overheads and ine… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
56
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
5
56
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Several researchers consider that e-Government strategy should not be restricted to the ICT area only, but should also be viewed, managed, and assessed as an organizational concern. This is consistent with Bakry's (2004) STOPE framework for e-Readiness assessment model and Heeks's (2003) model for measuring Information, Technology, Processes, Objectives and values, Staffing and skills, Management systems and structures (ITPOSMO). These models collectively focus on organizational factors of information, IT, business processes, challenges, vision, objective, values, skills, training, management systems and architecture of portal, time and budget.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several researchers consider that e-Government strategy should not be restricted to the ICT area only, but should also be viewed, managed, and assessed as an organizational concern. This is consistent with Bakry's (2004) STOPE framework for e-Readiness assessment model and Heeks's (2003) model for measuring Information, Technology, Processes, Objectives and values, Staffing and skills, Management systems and structures (ITPOSMO). These models collectively focus on organizational factors of information, IT, business processes, challenges, vision, objective, values, skills, training, management systems and architecture of portal, time and budget.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…As illustrated in Figure 1, this study integrates seven key areas which will be discussed further in this Section. Interviewees confirmed the findings in the literature that strategy is fundamental for e-Government adoption to be succeed (Bakry, 2004;Alshehri & Drew, 2010;Alsobhi et al, 2009;Yesser, 2013). There was unanimous agreement among interviewees that the primary factor for e-Government organizational readiness is strategy, for example, Interviewee # 10 stated that "Organizational e-Government strategy is important for any government organization".…”
Section: A Model For Organizational E-government Readinesssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…A study by Bakry (2004) introduced the STOPE model in order to provide a base for the development of an international framework related to e-government readiness. The model identified five dimensions (strategy, technology, organization, people and environment).…”
Section: Technological Aspects Of E-government Readiness and The Gapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the technology perspective, ICT facilities, infrastructure, and support have been identified as e-government readiness factors. Bakry (2004) highlighted that the STOPE model can be useful in decision-making at different stages. Moreover, countries need to consider all dimensions if they are willing to become developed.…”
Section: Technological Aspects Of E-government Readiness and The Gapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Em paralelo, novas Tecnologias de Informação e Comunicação (TIC), mais ubí-quas e interativas, aceleram a mudança nos padrões de relacionamento entre governo e sociedade, permitindo arranjos mais plurais e democráticos, baseados mais em redes do que em hierarquias (BAKRI, 2004). Poderosos stakeholders não estatais passam a estar cada vez mais envolvidos nos processos decisórios das organizações públicas, dotando os cidadãos de empowerment em suas relações com o Estado.…”
unclassified