Development of Universal Design Mobile Interface Guidelines (UDMIG) for Aging Population

Ruzic, Ljilja; Lee, Seunghyun Tina; Liu, Yilin Elaine; Sanford, Jon A.

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-40250-5_10

Cited by 18 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…More recent works on synthesis and evaluation of design guidelines for a wider range of touchscreen devices present them based on the usability problems older adults face, such as searching for information, issues with gestures, or element complexity [35]. Some researchers aim at reducing ''the gap between a designer's conceptual model and a user's mental model of the design'' [12] and attempt to make guidelines more applicable for the industry, for instance, providing a checklist of prescriptive design guidelines [10].…”

Section: A Prior Work On Compilation Of Guidelinesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The specific challenges of older adults in interacting with devices has motivated a wide range of research contributions in the form of design methods and guidelines for making devices usable and accessible for this population [10]- [12], for instance, by providing voice-activated dialing for people with limited hand dexterity [13], text entry support for older adults with severe visual decline [14], or gestures for interacting with touch based interfaces tailored for age-related motor declines [15].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A Systematic Literature Review of Research-Derived Touchscreen Design Guidelines for Older Adults

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The distinct abilities of older adults to interact with touchscreen devices have motivated a wide range of contributions in the form of design guidelines, which aim at informing the design for the aging population. However, despite the growing effort by the research community, many challenges still remain in translating these research findings into actionable design guidelines, with reports hinting scant adoption or implementation issues, which ultimately hurt the development of more accessible interactive systems. In this systematic literature review, we look at the research-derived design guidelines that set the foundation for design guideline compilations and standards, analyzing the aforementioned issues from the perspective of experts trying to discover, classify, and evaluate the work on the area of touchscreen design guidelines for older adults. The review analyses 52 research articles resulting in 434 research-derived design guidelines for touchscreen applications. These guidelines are analyzed using a taxonomy that considered the older adults ability evolution and the design aspects that are the target of the recommendations. The results point to the use of different definition of older adults, which go as early as 55+, with the design of displays and interaction styles to accommodate to vision and dexterity declines as the most prominent areas of research. However, proposed guidelines and recommendations were validated in only 15% of articles analyzed. The analysis also revealed that identifying guidelines and characterizing their focus in terms of ability declines and design aspects addressed is a demanding activity and prone to error, given the quality of reporting and details offered in research articles.INDEX TERMS Information and communication technology, accessibility, ageing, older adults, systematic literature review.

show abstract

Section: A Prior Work On Compilation Of Guidelinesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Systematic Literature Review of Research-Derived Touchscreen Design Guidelines for Older Adults

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The accessibility of existing 'Terms and Conditions' and 'Privacy Policy' statements must be reconsidered by mobile application developers. Universal Design Guidelines [57] must be embraced to make sure the content of user agreements is presented in a way that the user can interact with. When designing user agreements, mobile application developers should embrace the plethora of multi-media options available to them (e.g.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Implementing Electric Consent Aimed at People Living with Dementia and Their Caregivers: Did We Forget Those Who Forget?

O’Connor

Twohig²,

O’Brien³

2021

Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

As policy flows down from law and/or regulation (e.g. GDPR) our individual privacy concerns give rise to demands on improving accessibility, awareness and comprehension, the topic of eConsent is becoming more prevalent. We provide a critical voice by considering, but also challenging, the underlying assumptions that the status quo of eConsent design and implementation is appropriate for all people in society. By answering "what eConsent characteristics are prevalent in the context of dementia applications?", this paper identifies that the "one size fits all" ethos for eConsent is not applicable in every context. As a result, a taxonomy that depicts the multifaceted concept of eConsent is proposed. It makes us aware of the different ethical, legal, social and technical implications of ICT use and provides an opportunity to create discourse in this area. It argues that future research examining the effectiveness of innovative ICTs must take the eConsent process into account.

show abstract

“…This study uses the existing design guidelines to improve design quality of mobile health applications for older adults. In the same context, (Ruzic et al,) [79] proposed a set of GUI design guidelines based on the Universal Design (UD) and Design for Aging strategies to ensure the guidance of mobile devices for older adults. Furthermore, coherence is also being solicited for the evaluation of mobile user interface.…”

Section: -Preliminary Evaluation Phasementioning

confidence: 99%

Assessing the quality of mobile graphical user interfaces using multi-objective optimization

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aesthetic defects are a violation of quality attributes that are symptoms of bad interface design programming decisions. They lead to deteriorating the perceived usability of mobile user interfaces and negatively impact the Users eXperience (UX) with the mobile app. Most existing studies relied on a subjective evaluation of aesthetic defects depending on end-users feedback, which makes the manual evaluation of mobile user interfaces human-centric, time-consuming, and error-prone. Therefore, recent studies have dedicated their effort to focus on the definition of mathematical formulas that each targets a specific structural quality of the interface. As the UX is tightly dependent on the user profile, the combination and calibration of quality attributes, formulas, and users characteristics, when defining a defect, is not straightforward. In this context, we propose a fully automated framework which combines literature quality attributes with the users profile to identify aesthetic defects of MUI. More precisely, we consider the mobile user interface evaluation as a multi-objective optimization problem where the goal is to maximize the number of detected violations while minimizing the detection complexity of detection rules and enhancing the interfaces overall quality in means

show abstract

Development of Universal Design Mobile Interface Guidelines (UDMIG) for Aging Population

Cited by 18 publications

References 12 publications

A Systematic Literature Review of Research-Derived Touchscreen Design Guidelines for Older Adults

A Systematic Literature Review of Research-Derived Touchscreen Design Guidelines for Older Adults

Implementing Electric Consent Aimed at People Living with Dementia and Their Caregivers: Did We Forget Those Who Forget?

Assessing the quality of mobile graphical user interfaces using multi-objective optimization

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About