2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2011.06.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developments in construction-scale additive manufacturing processes

Abstract: Additive manufacturing in construction is beginning to move from an architect"s modelling tool to delivering full-scale architectural components and elements of buildings such as walls and facades. This paper discusses large-scale additive manufacturing processes that have been applied in the construction and architecture arena and focuses on "Concrete Printing", an automated extrusion based process. The wet properties of the material are critical to the success of manufacture and a number of new criteria have… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
520
0
37

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 930 publications
(557 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
520
0
37
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently, developments are going so fast that any overview of existing techniques and examples is out-of-date almost as soon as it is published. Nevertheless, Lim et al (2012), Wolfs (2015), and Wu et al (2016) give a sound impression of the development of the state of affairs.…”
Section: Historymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Currently, developments are going so fast that any overview of existing techniques and examples is out-of-date almost as soon as it is published. Nevertheless, Lim et al (2012), Wolfs (2015), and Wu et al (2016) give a sound impression of the development of the state of affairs.…”
Section: Historymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is similar to the 40 × 10 mm nozzle applied by the TU/e. The Concrete Printer of Loughborough University uses smaller, circular nozzles of Ø 6-20 mm, resulting in a layer thickness of 6-25 mm (Lim et al 2012), whereas the Contour Crafting reports a layer thickness of 13 mm resulting from a Ø 15 mm nozzle (Hwang and Khoshnevis 2004).…”
Section: Comparison Of Amoc Operatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations