Graphene Simulation 2011
DOI: 10.5772/20477
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DFT Calculation for Adatom Adsorption on Graphene

Abstract: Graphene is well-known to be two-dimensional material made of carbon atoms. Graphene is the basic material to form nanotube, fullerene and graphite. Graphene is a substance that attracts attention not only as parts of the nanocarbons but also for its own interesting electronic and mechanic properties (T. Ando, A. K. Geim et.al, K.S. Novoselov et.al). In the last decade, the most significant problem is how to make wide and high quality graphene itself. Nowadays, good quality graphene can be made in labolatories… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
68
1
6

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
7
68
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…For the graphene surface the bridge site was found to be the most favorable adsorption site for both B and N adsorbates. [38] However, we find that the most favorable adsorption sites on the silicene surface are the valley and bridge sites for B and N adsorbates, respectively. While the adsorption of the B (N) atom occurs with a -1.8 (-4.6) eV binding energy on graphene, [38] for silicene the bonding between B (N) and the silicene lattice is stronger with a binding energy of -5.85 (-5.54) eV.…”
Section: A Atomic Structure and Migration Barriersmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For the graphene surface the bridge site was found to be the most favorable adsorption site for both B and N adsorbates. [38] However, we find that the most favorable adsorption sites on the silicene surface are the valley and bridge sites for B and N adsorbates, respectively. While the adsorption of the B (N) atom occurs with a -1.8 (-4.6) eV binding energy on graphene, [38] for silicene the bonding between B (N) and the silicene lattice is stronger with a binding energy of -5.85 (-5.54) eV.…”
Section: A Atomic Structure and Migration Barriersmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…[38] However, we find that the most favorable adsorption sites on the silicene surface are the valley and bridge sites for B and N adsorbates, respectively. While the adsorption of the B (N) atom occurs with a -1.8 (-4.6) eV binding energy on graphene, [38] for silicene the bonding between B (N) and the silicene lattice is stronger with a binding energy of -5.85 (-5.54) eV. The Al and P atom preferential adsorption sites were found to be the valley site with a binding energy of -2.87 eV and the hill site with an adsorption energy of -5.28 eV, respectively.…”
Section: A Atomic Structure and Migration Barriersmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to the different bonding mechanism in vdWE, compared to conventional epitaxy with strong chemical bonding, the grown materials do not need to be lattice matched with the graphitic substrate and no strain induced interfacial defects are to be expected. Due to the increasing interest of using graphene as a substrate material for epitaxial growth, recent density functional calculations have been employed to investigate the adsorption sites and adsorption energies of different atoms and molecules on the graphene surface [165,166]. These theoretical calculations predict the plausibility of also conventional epitaxy i.e.…”
Section: Nw Growth On Graphenementioning
confidence: 99%
“…17,[46][47][48] It is known that the shift is sensitive to the concentration of dopants and/or adatoms (i.e., the size of the simulation cell). Also, the calculations of charge transfer derived from several methods such as integration of the density of states (DOS), line distribution of the charge density di↵erences, and classical approaches show inconsistent results.…”
Section: A Alcl/graphene Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%