Diagnosing capabilities in family firms: An overview of visual research methods and suggestions for future applications

Abstract

Family firms often develop unique capabilities over time, but these organizational competencies are difficult to identify, isolate and describe independently of the key individuals in the family firm. In this article, we provide examples and an overview on research methods that can be used to identify and visualize organizational competencies in family firms. We report from pilot applications of such visual competence diagnostics in an action research mode. We structure our article as follows: We first show the relevance of the competence visualization topic for family firms. In a second step we classify available methods for competence visualization in a simple framework. In a third step, we report on our experience on researching a family firm with the help of visual competence diagnostics methods. We conclude the article with implications for family firm researchers and practitioners and provide a brief outlook on visual research methods and their role in better understanding family firms. Keywords: family firms, competence visualization, visual methods, action research, competence diagnosticsThis is the Authors' accepted manuscript for self-archiving purposes. Please refer to the final publication on Elsevier's website for pages and citation. The final publication is available on: http://dx

Family firms’ innovation drivers and performance: a dynamic capabilities approach

“…(2016) adopt DCs in a family firm context and recognize the move toward the concept of dynamic familiness; they incorporate family learning mechanisms in their dynamic familiness. Comi and Eppler (2014) provide examples that can be used to identify and visualize organizational competencies in family firms. In family firms, competencies and DCs involve learning, adaptation and change.…”

Return on capital in Spanish tourism businesses: A comparative analysis of family vs non-family businesses

“…This contradiction is not surprising considering the typical portrait of FB, revealing the persistence of important competitive disadvantages in key intangible assets for differentiation (Casillas, Moreno, & Barbero, 2011;Cooper, Upton, & Seaman, 2005;Kontinen & Ojala, 2010;Miller, McLeod, & Oh, 2001;Westhead, 1997), related to the lack of intellectual capital, knowledge (Block et al, 2011;Le Breton-Miller, Miller, & Lester, 2011) and innovation (Block, 2012;Chin, Chen, Kleinman, & Lee, 2009;Chrisman & Patel, 2012), and lower search breadth (Classen, Van Gils, Bammens, & Carree, 2012). As pointed out by Comi and Eppler (2014), family businesses lose their competitiveness as family managers are averse to taking entrepreneurial risks, over-exploiting existing competences and preventing the firm developing dynamic capabilities.…”

Family business successors' motivation and innovation capabilities: the case of Kosovo

“…FBs are considered to be the oldest forms of business organization (Comi and Eppler, 2014;Zahra et al, 2004). In the first publication in Family Business Review, Lansberge et al (1988) Successors' motivation and innovation capabilities raised the question of what is an FB?…”