2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10620-020-06484-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnosing Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth: A Comparison of Lactulose Breath Tests to Small Bowel Aspirates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
14
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, fewer patients had a positive duodenal aspirate in the current study (16.5%, compared with 25.9% of patients by lactulose breath test) [5]. Understanding that the true prevalence of SIBO remains unknown, it is possible that the low frequency of duodenal aspirate positivity may be the result of missed SIBO in the mid-or distal-small bowel.…”
contrasting
confidence: 54%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Interestingly, fewer patients had a positive duodenal aspirate in the current study (16.5%, compared with 25.9% of patients by lactulose breath test) [5]. Understanding that the true prevalence of SIBO remains unknown, it is possible that the low frequency of duodenal aspirate positivity may be the result of missed SIBO in the mid-or distal-small bowel.…”
contrasting
confidence: 54%
“…In comparison with breath testing, duodenal aspiration appeals to patients due to its similarity with direct cultures used to confirm common infectious disease diagnoses, and to clinicians due to its original status as the 'gold standard' test for a SIBO diagnosis in Billroth II patients [1]. Unfortunately, duodenal aspirate samples are frequently contaminated, representing 20% of samples in the current study, which can be explained by the lack of dedicated commercial devices designed to collect aspirates, challenges in avoiding collection of oral flora during tracheoesophageal intubation, and the lack of randomized controlled trials or international consensus protocols addressing appropriate sampling protocols [5].…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since most nutrient absorption occurs in the small intestine, it is important to understand the characteristics of the mucosa in this intestinal region (El Aidy et al, 2013). The lactulose breath test (LBT) qualitatively evaluates bacterial growth in the small intestine, with the advantages of being noninvasive, convenient, sensitive, accurate, and reproducible (Cangemi et al, 2021). Therefore, in this study, we used LC-MS to explore the changes in metabolites in the serum of pregnant women during pregnancy, and the methane hydrogen breath test evaluated the bacterial growth of the small intestine.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is widely used in the clinic as an important method to diagnose SIBO. However, the sensitivity range of the hydrogen breath test is 20%-90%, possibly because of the lack of uniform diagnostic criteria, which has been resolved by the recently published North American breath test consensus[ 8 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%