2018
DOI: 10.1097/ccm.0000000000003129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic Accuracy of Chest Radiograph, and When Concomitantly Studied Lung Ultrasound, in Critically Ill Patients With Respiratory Symptoms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract: This meta-analysis demonstrates that chest radiograph has a low sensitivity and reasonable specificity compared with CT for detecting lung pathology in critically ill patients. The studies also investigating lung ultrasound, showed lung ultrasound to be clearly superior to chest radiograph in terms of sensitivity with similar specificity, thereby opting to be the first-line diagnostic tool in these patients.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
105
1
5

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
105
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…As stated by Hirschtick, a "quick physical exam" is often used by the unexperienced fingers and is not much worth 47 . Lastly, a diagnostic tool can be considered obsolete when a more accurate diagnostic test is available, for example lung ultrasound which is further described below 48 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As stated by Hirschtick, a "quick physical exam" is often used by the unexperienced fingers and is not much worth 47 . Lastly, a diagnostic tool can be considered obsolete when a more accurate diagnostic test is available, for example lung ultrasound which is further described below 48 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LUS, which should be seen as part of the physical examination, has many potential advantages over lung auscultation and CXR: its high accuracy, quick and easy performance and interpretation at the bedside; dynamic imaging; avoidance of radiation and contrast burden; evaluation of disease progress; and reduction of costs 51 . LUS turned out to be highly accurate for most diagnosis studied in this meta-analysis with a sensitivity and specificity of more than 90% 48,[51][52][53][54][55][56] . There is also evidence showing that LUS detects respiratory problems at an early stage and impacts clinical decision making 54,[57][58][59][60][61] .…”
Section: Further Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Respiratory muscle weakness as the major cause for acute respiratory failure is uncommon, but should be considered if more common causes have been excluded [30,31]. The clinical presentation of diaphragm dysfunction depends on the cause, severity and rate of progression (E-Table 1) [32].…”
Section: Role Of Respiratory Muscle Ultrasound In Acute Respiratory Fmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the last 10 years, several papers have confirmed the usefulness of LUS in specific settings . In particular, the accuracy of LUS is at least not inferior to CXR in the diagnosis and monitoring of pneumothorax (PTX), pleural effusion, interstitial syndrome (IS) and community‐acquired pneumonia (CAP) . Furthermore, LUS detects some signs of cardiac involvement in the context of some diseases such as acute pulmonary oedema or heart failure …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%