2020
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012824.pub2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic test accuracy of jolt accentuation for headache in acute meningitis in the emergency setting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Jolt accentuation of headache (JAH) is the most recently used type of physical examination to assess the irritation that occurred due to meningitis. JAH was considered positive if the headache from the inflamed meninges increased upon rotating the patient's head horizontally two or three times per second (97,140). Although reasonable levels of sensitivity and specificity of the JAH to suggest meningitis were reported, it cannot be deemed a reliable test for definitive diagnosis of VM.…”
Section: Diagnostic Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Jolt accentuation of headache (JAH) is the most recently used type of physical examination to assess the irritation that occurred due to meningitis. JAH was considered positive if the headache from the inflamed meninges increased upon rotating the patient's head horizontally two or three times per second (97,140). Although reasonable levels of sensitivity and specificity of the JAH to suggest meningitis were reported, it cannot be deemed a reliable test for definitive diagnosis of VM.…”
Section: Diagnostic Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although reasonable levels of sensitivity and specificity of the JAH to suggest meningitis were reported, it cannot be deemed a reliable test for definitive diagnosis of VM. JAH was recommended in some studies to be used in emergency settings to exclude meningitis (57,97). Compared with the other physical examinations, the JAH showed better sensitivity and specificity rates for the diagnosis of meningitis (171).…”
Section: Diagnostic Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A systematic review done by Iguchi and colleagues showed that jolt accentuation can be used in emergency settings to exclude meningitis. However, the pooled sensitivity and specificity of this test (65.3%, 70.4% respectively) are considered low, and more research is needed to assess its usefulness [ 32 ]. To test for etiological agents, a lumbar puncture and collection of CSF is needed.…”
Section: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies-2 (QUADAS-2) was carried out to determine the study design and attributes of each included article [18] . Two independent reviewers were tasked with performing a thorough evaluation of the study, during which possible disagreements in proceedings were discussed, and a unanimous decision was reached.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies-2 (QUADAS-2) was carried out to determine the study design and attributes of each included article. [18] Two independent reviewers were tasked with performing a thorough evaluation of the study, during which possible disagreements in proceedings were discussed, and a unanimous decision was reached. Detailed information, such as the year of publication and country, false-positive, SPE, sample types, false-negative, author's first name, SEN, true-negative, and participant characteristics, was extracted from the available literature search.…”
Section: Quality Assessment and Data Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%