The 41st International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research &Amp; Development in Information Retrieval 2018
DOI: 10.1145/3209978.3209997
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dialogue Act Recognition via CRF-Attentive Structured Network

Abstract: Dialogue Act Recognition (DAR) is a challenging problem in dialogue interpretation, which aims to attach semantic labels to utterances and characterize the speaker's intention. Currently, many existing approaches formulate the DAR problem ranging from multi-classification to structured prediction, which suffer from handcrafted feature extensions and attentive contextual structural dependencies. In this paper, we consider the problem of DAR from the viewpoint of extending richer Conditional Random Field (CRF) s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
111
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
111
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, our work is related to a large body of research on dialog acts (Stolcke et al, 2000;Kim et al, 2010;Chen et al, 2018): our low-level intent labels (Table 1) can be seen as very finegrained dialog acts (Core and Allen, 1997;Bunt et al, 2010;Oraby et al, 2017).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, our work is related to a large body of research on dialog acts (Stolcke et al, 2000;Kim et al, 2010;Chen et al, 2018): our low-level intent labels (Table 1) can be seen as very finegrained dialog acts (Core and Allen, 1997;Bunt et al, 2010;Oraby et al, 2017).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, DAs can be thought of as a tag set that classifies utterances according to a combination of pragmatic, semantic, and syntactic criteria. From Table I, we can also find that knowing the past utterances of dialog can help easing the prediction of the current DA state, thus help to narrow the range of utterance generation topics for the current turn [5]. For instance, the "Greeting" and "Farewell" acts are often followed with another same type utterances, the "Answer" act often responds to the former "Question" type utterance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Moreover, the label assigned to an utterance depends on the current state of the dialogue (Stone, 2005) and prediction of an utterance's label benefits from referring to other utterances in context and their labels (Jaiswal et al, 2019). Deep learning models like RNNs and CNNs have proven effective tools to encode neighbouring utterances (Chen et al, 2018;Liu et al, 2017;Blunsom and Kalchbrenner, 2013;Bothe et al, 2018;Kumar et al, 2017). However such models rely on large annotated corpora that are prohibitively expensive to procure, especially for niche domains.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%