2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.aucc.2016.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diaphragm ultrasound as a new method to predict extubation outcome in mechanically ventilated patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
89
5
6

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
8
89
5
6
Order By: Relevance
“…In this work there was no statistical significant difference between the studied Also, these results are not going with (16).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…In this work there was no statistical significant difference between the studied Also, these results are not going with (16).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…Using the same cutoff, no association was found between diaphragm dysfunction and extubation failure [51]. Interestingly, when diaphragm excursion is measured after 30 min from initiation of a 2 h SBT, predictive performance of 10 mm cutoff seems to be significantly higher (AUROC 0.88) [52]. Post-cardiac surgery patients with unilateral diaphragmatic paralysis could be extubated without delay, when the contralateral diaphragm excursion was > 25 mm at maximal inspiratory effort [53].…”
Section: Diaphragm Excursionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When performed during an SBT, TFdi > 30-36% has shown to predict extubation success [52,54,58]. Ferrari et al evaluated in 46 patients ventilated through a tracheostomy tube, the role of TFdi(max) of the right hemidiaphragm during an SBT, as a predictor of weaning outcome [59] and reported that a TFdi(max) > 36% was associated with a successful SBT (sensitivity 0.82; specificity 0.88; AUROC 0.95).…”
Section: Diaphragm Thickening Fractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of studies have investigated these two parameters, either individually or in combination, with the aim of identifying cut-off values as predictors of successful weaning (see Table 2) [43,53,[61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73]. However, the results have been heterogeneous in terms of outcome results and cut-off values due to differences in study protocol design and outcome designation.…”
Section: Diaphragm Ultrasound (Dus)mentioning
confidence: 99%