1971
DOI: 10.1007/bf02095142
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Die diagnostische Aussagekraft des exspiratorischen Flußvolumendiagramms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0
1

Year Published

1972
1972
1984
1984

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The reason lies in the high scatter in single val ues caused by lack of patient cooperation. The results in table 1 confirm that flow-vol ume values are more sensitive than those of FEV [21], The effort-dependent results seemed to show the least postoperative im provement. This is no contradiction to the fact that the effort-dependent parameters are decreased in extrathoracic airway ob struction [8,14,20].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The reason lies in the high scatter in single val ues caused by lack of patient cooperation. The results in table 1 confirm that flow-vol ume values are more sensitive than those of FEV [21], The effort-dependent results seemed to show the least postoperative im provement. This is no contradiction to the fact that the effort-dependent parameters are decreased in extrathoracic airway ob struction [8,14,20].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Similarly, the flow-volume curve is mostly egg-shaped [21] and the maximal inspiratory flow (V m .ix .in s p .) is reduced to the same extent as or more than the maximal expiratory flow (Vluax exp) [5].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ref erence values were those of CECA [13] for lung vol umes and of Overrath et al [14] for flow-volume curves.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sie sind einfach zu messen und zwar mitarbeitsabhängig, jedoch z.T. anstrengungsunabhängig (20). Von den mitarbeitsabhängigen Meßparametern zeigen sie die höchste Sensitivität zur Trennung zwischen positivem und negativem Test (6, 16).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified