1924
DOI: 10.1007/bf01735820
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Die Sehbahn in Chirurgischer Beziehung und die Faradische Reizung des Sehzentrums

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1927
1927
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As early as 1918, Löwenstein and Borchardt (1) reported that while performing an operation to remove bone fragments caused by a bullet wound, the patient's left occipital lobe was electrically stimulated, and the patient perceived flickering in the right visual field. Foerster (2) and Krause (3) reported similar cases of visual perception caused by electrical stimulation of the visual cortex during removal an occipital epileptic focus. The significance of these studies was that they demonstrated that the position of electrically induced visual percepts within the visual field was systematically related to the area of the occipital lobe that received the electrical stimulation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…As early as 1918, Löwenstein and Borchardt (1) reported that while performing an operation to remove bone fragments caused by a bullet wound, the patient's left occipital lobe was electrically stimulated, and the patient perceived flickering in the right visual field. Foerster (2) and Krause (3) reported similar cases of visual perception caused by electrical stimulation of the visual cortex during removal an occipital epileptic focus. The significance of these studies was that they demonstrated that the position of electrically induced visual percepts within the visual field was systematically related to the area of the occipital lobe that received the electrical stimulation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The very important study of Borchardt and Lowenstein demonstrated that electrical stimulation produced the same disturbances in the patient as those which took place spontaneousy: turning of the patient's eyes to the right; scintillation; flames; visual hallucinations. Krause in a similar study ascertained the interesting fact that the experimentally produced subjective visual phenomena did not leave any after-images (148).…”
mentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Eliciting visual perception via electrical stimulation of the visual cortices was first reported in a case study by Löwenstein and Borchardt in 1918 where wounded soldiers were able to see flickering light perceptions on the opposite half of their visual field after stimulation of occipital lobe [44]. This was then followed by the work of Förster and Krause who were able to expose the human occipital lobe under local anesthesia and reliably induce perception of phosphenes [45,46]. These studies set the groundwork for the first systematic effort to develop a visual cortical prosthetic by Brindley and Lewin [47].…”
Section: Historymentioning
confidence: 97%