1960
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1226556
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Die Strahlenbelastung des Untersuchten bei Routinedurchleuchtungen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1967
1967
1978
1978

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When we compare this time with that of 400_+198 seconds used in our 140 upper GI series, or that of 508 • 183 seconds in our 100 barium enema investigations, we find that we are well within accepted fluoroscopic limits to investigations used currently. Table 3 illustrates this same point with reference to the literature where the fluoroscopic times used by a radiologist and a resident in radiology are compared [4,5]. Our conventional radiological investigations were primarily performed by residents, and Table 3 illustrates the increased fluoroscopic time needed by residents for a similar study compared to an expert radiologist.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…When we compare this time with that of 400_+198 seconds used in our 140 upper GI series, or that of 508 • 183 seconds in our 100 barium enema investigations, we find that we are well within accepted fluoroscopic limits to investigations used currently. Table 3 illustrates this same point with reference to the literature where the fluoroscopic times used by a radiologist and a resident in radiology are compared [4,5]. Our conventional radiological investigations were primarily performed by residents, and Table 3 illustrates the increased fluoroscopic time needed by residents for a similar study compared to an expert radiologist.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%