1991
DOI: 10.3354/meps073173
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diet and feeding of Euphausia hanseni and Nematoscelis megalops (Euphausiacea) in the northern Benguela Current: ecological significance of vertical space partitioning

Abstract: Patterns of diel migration and feeding of Euphausia hanseni and Nernatoscelis rnegalops were investigated in waters of the northern Benguela (Namibia) upwelling system. N. megalops migrated to just below the thermocline at night and fed maximally in the early evening E. hanseni migrated to above the thermocline at night and fed progressively throughout the night. Although both species were omnivorous and consumed similar size ranges of copepod prey, differential prey sizefrequency with depth resulted in E. han… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
26
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar trophic positions for T. longicaudata and T. inermis have been found in other studies around Svalbard in the Barents Sea and the Arctic Ocean shelf-break region (Søreide et al 2006, Tamelander et al 2006, and also agree with our results for the 2 species in the mouth of Godthåb-sfjord and in the offshore region. Based on results from the present and previous studies, we therefore conclude that the trophic position of the species might to a large extent depend on available prey, since krill can consume a wide range of prey types (Boyd et al 1984, McClatchie 1985, Barange et al 1991, Agersted et al 2011.…”
Section: Differences Between Speciesmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Similar trophic positions for T. longicaudata and T. inermis have been found in other studies around Svalbard in the Barents Sea and the Arctic Ocean shelf-break region (Søreide et al 2006, Tamelander et al 2006, and also agree with our results for the 2 species in the mouth of Godthåb-sfjord and in the offshore region. Based on results from the present and previous studies, we therefore conclude that the trophic position of the species might to a large extent depend on available prey, since krill can consume a wide range of prey types (Boyd et al 1984, McClatchie 1985, Barange et al 1991, Agersted et al 2011.…”
Section: Differences Between Speciesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…, and also agree with our results for the 2 species in the mouth of Godthåb-sfjord and in the offshore region. Based on results from the present and previous studies, we therefore conclude that the trophic position of the species might to a large extent depend on available prey, since krill can consume a wide range of prey types (Boyd et al 1984, McClatchie 1985, Barange et al 1991, Agersted et al 2011). …”
Section: Differences Between Speciesmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…They are omnivorous feeders (Ohman 1984, Barange et al 1991, Suh et al 1991, Båmstedt & Karlson 1998, Dilling et al 1998, Gurney et al 2001, Hernandez-Leon et al 2001 and are consumed by many predators including seabirds (Ainley et al 1996), pelagic fishes (Genin et al 1988, Reilly et al 1992, Tanasichuk 1999) and marine mammals (Fiedler et al 1998). Euphausiids of the California Current have been the subject of many studies (Brinton 1960, 1962, Brinton & Wyllie 1976, Youngbluth 1976, Mullin & Conversi 1988, Simard & Mackas 1989, with some focusing only on the most dominant species of the Northern California region, Euphausia pacifica (Smiles & Pearcy 1971, Brinton 1976.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%