Four krill species with overlapping functional biology coexist in Greenland waters. Here, we used stable isotopes to investigate and discuss their trophic role and mode of coexistence. Bulk carbon (δ
Resale or republication not permitted without written consent of the publisherMar Ecol Prog Ser 516: 139-151, 2014 140 Krill have a broader prey-size spectrum than copepods, and are capable of exploiting several trophic levels (Boyd et al. 1984, McClatchie 1985, Barange et al. 1991, Agersted et al. 2011. The fact that krill are generalists could be a key trait that resolves 'the paradox' for this group as this means that interspecific food competition is reduced. A prerequisite for interspecific competition to occur between sympatric congeners such as krill is food scarcity; therefore, if food is in excess, competition for resources will be irrelevant.A standard approach for investigating the preysize spectrum and trophic position of zooplankton is bottle grazing experiments, where the experimental results also can be extrapolated to grazing impacts in situ. However, the limitation of these experiments is that they only represent a snapshot in time: They do not reflect the in situ prey variability in time and space because the experimental animals are unable to display migratory behaviour within the confines of a bottle.Analysis of gut content or faecal pellet composition is another approach to investigate krill feeding (e.g. González 1992, Karlson & Båmstedt 1994, Schmidt et al. 2003. However, this method only provides snapshot information of recently ingested prey and is biased towards prey with an exoskeleton, such as larger zooplankton, and thus underestimates or ignores soft-bodied prey (Båmstedt et al. 2000).Stable isotope analysis provides an alternative and complimentary method for determining trophic position (Peterson & Fry 1987, Fry 1988, Hobson & Welch 1992. This method gives a time-integrated average trophic position of a given species, since the heavier isotopes accumulate from prey to predator over time (Fry & Sherr 1984, Fry 1988. Stable nitrogen isotope (δ 15 N) values provide an estimate of the trophic position of a consumer (Vander Zanden & Rasmussen 2001), whereas carbon isotope (δ 13 C) values can be used as a proxy for the source of primary production, and the inshore and benthic versus offshore and pela gic feeding preferences of a consumer (Hobson et al. 1994, France 1995. Previous studies have investigated stable isotopes in krill around Svalbard (Søreide et al. 2006, Søreide et al. 2013, Iceland (Petursdottir et al. 2008 and Greenland (Holst Hansen et al. 2012). However, these studies only investigate a specific area and do not look at spatial differences in stable isotopes among species present. Because isotope signals at the base of the food web vary at spatial scales (e.g. Holst Hansen et al. 2012), studies considering spatial differences in stable isotopes provide insights into the origin of nutrients as well as into the local variability of feeding preferences.Go...