1981
DOI: 10.1016/0300-483x(81)90088-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dietary deprivation induces fetal loss and abortion in rabbits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
37
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
8
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Apart from temperature changes, mated or pregnant rabbits are known to be insensitive to other distressing effects; housing in restraining cages exerted no effects on LH surge and ovulation (YoungLai and Dimond, 1976) and restricted feeding induced no effects on morphology of fetuses (Breslin et al, 2000;Matsuoka et al, 2006;Matsuzawa et al, 1981;Petrere et al, 1993). The present trial with restraining devices again confirmed previous results and revealed no effects on various parameters or fetuses morphology.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Apart from temperature changes, mated or pregnant rabbits are known to be insensitive to other distressing effects; housing in restraining cages exerted no effects on LH surge and ovulation (YoungLai and Dimond, 1976) and restricted feeding induced no effects on morphology of fetuses (Breslin et al, 2000;Matsuoka et al, 2006;Matsuzawa et al, 1981;Petrere et al, 1993). The present trial with restraining devices again confirmed previous results and revealed no effects on various parameters or fetuses morphology.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Conditions of restricted feeding required to induce some effects on reproductive performance in pregnant rabbits in the previous reports are inconsistent: restricted feeding at 15 g/ head/day from GD 6 to 18 or GD 7 to 19 induced abortion at low incidence (Clark et al, 1986;Petrere et al, 1993;Cappon et al, 2005). Restricted feeding at 20 g/ head/dam from GD 6 to 20 induced high incidence of abortion (Matsuzawa et al, 1981). Restricted feeding at 35 to 75 g/head/day from GD 6 to 18 or GD 7 to 19 induced no definite abortion (Clark et al, 1986;Petrere et al, 1993;Cappon et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…As for embryo-fetal effects, restricted feeding at 15 g/head/day from GD 6 to 18 induced teratogenic effects, increased embryo-fetal lethality and decreased fetal body weight (Clark et al, 1986), decreased fetal body weight (Petrere et al, 1993) and restricted feeding at 15 to 75 g/ head/day from GD 7 to 19 induced decreased fetal body weight and high incidence of skeletal unossification (Cappon et al, 2005). Restricted feeding at 20 g/head/ day from GD 6 to 20 induced increased embryo-fetal lethality and decreases in fetal and placental weights, and restricted feeding at 60g/head/day during the same stage induced increased embryo-fetal lethality (Matsuzawa et al, 1981). With regard to increased embryofetal lethality, the present results largely coincided with those in previous literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations