2017
DOI: 10.12661/pap.2017.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diferentes Dosadores De Sementes E Velocidades De Deslocamento Na Semeadura Do Milho Em Plantio Direto

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
13
0
9

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
4
13
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Slower sowing forward speeds favored higher regularity. These data corroborate with Bottega et al (2018), who reported that the seed metering with alveolar horizontal disc presented a higher average of failed plants when sowing corn. The same was observed for the highest sowing forward speed (8 km h −1 ), as the interaction between metering mechanisms and sowing forward speeds did not show significant differences (Table 3).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Slower sowing forward speeds favored higher regularity. These data corroborate with Bottega et al (2018), who reported that the seed metering with alveolar horizontal disc presented a higher average of failed plants when sowing corn. The same was observed for the highest sowing forward speed (8 km h −1 ), as the interaction between metering mechanisms and sowing forward speeds did not show significant differences (Table 3).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Sowing forward speeds from 3 to 7 km h −1 (Table 3) presented acceptable values of normal spacing, close to 90%. However, a reduction in the number of normal spacings was observed when working above this limit, which agrees with Bottega et al (2018), who used pneumatic seed metering in corn sowing and observed that the most appropriate plant distribution was performed at speeds of 4 and 6 km h −1 . Similarly, Alonço et al (2015) evaluated different pneumatic metering mechanisms and sowing forward speeds (5.0, 7.5, and 10 km h −1 ) and found that an increase in speed significantly influenced the acceptable spacing index, going from 80.47 to 70.53%, on average, which is the same effect found for failed spacings, with means of 5.12, 7.47, and 11.24% for the mentioned speeds.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations