Difference in pulmonary function test among the athletic and sedentary population

Vedala, ShobhaRani; Paul, Niranjan; Mane, Abhay B

doi:10.5455/njppp.2013.3.109-114

Cited by 24 publications

(17 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…These effects of vitamin D may be mediated through surfactant, a substance maintaining alveolar structural integrity [109], lung compliance, and oxygen exchange. It should be stressed that lung compliance, FEV1, FVC, and cardiopulmonary oxygen transfer are linearly related with physical performance [110]. Indeed, vitamin D induces the synthesis of alveolar surfactant and plays a critical role in epithelial-mesenchymal interactions during lung growth [111].…”

Section: Effects Of Vitamin D On Pulmonary Functionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Vitamin D and Physical Activity

Koundourakis¹,

Margioris²

2017

A Critical Evaluation of Vitamin D - Basic Overview

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Vitamin D is synthesized in the skin following exposure to ultraviolet radiation, producing cholecalciferol, while only a small percentage of the circulating vitamin D is of exogenous origin deriving from food. Following two sequential hydroxylations, in the liver and in the kidneys, vitamin D is fully activated. Although its role in bone physiology and calcium homeostasis is well documented, there is emerging evidence that vitamin D exerts a plethora of additional effects on most tissues regulating the musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, and immune systems as well as energy homeostasis. Its deficiency/insufficiency poses a major public health problem observed in all age groups and regardless of latitude and insolation. In muscles, vitamin D deficiency is associated with a decline in neuromuscular function including muscular strength, walking speed, balance, jumping and sprinting performance, and aerobic capacity, although the evidence is still weak regarding its effects in the young and the athletes. Supplementation counteracts the negative effects of vitamin D deficiency on performance although in individuals with adequate levels of vitamin D, additional supplementation does not appear to enhance further physical capabilities. The aim of this chapter is to review our current understanding of diverse effects of vitamin D in physical performance in athletic and nonathletic populations.

show abstract

Section: Effects Of Vitamin D On Pulmonary Functionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Vitamin D and Physical Activity

Koundourakis¹,

Margioris²

2017

A Critical Evaluation of Vitamin D - Basic Overview

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…16 We found that the mean FVC in athletes was significantly better (95.66%) compared to that of non-athletes (88.43%). Similarly, Vedala et al 17 and Mahotra 18 stated that the FVC in athletes was significantly higher than in non-athletes. Muscular exercise increases the rate and depth of respiration and improves FVC, the consumption of O 2 , and the rate of diffusion.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 90%

Lung function in athletes and non-athletes aged 13-15 years

Saputri

Mayangsari

Subanada

2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Regular sports or physical training contributes in increasing the body’s pulmonary function. The increase of pulmonary function is determined by the strength of respiratory muscle, thoracic compliance, upper respiratory system resistance, and pulmonary elasticity. Objective To compare pulmonary function between athletes and non-athletes aged 13-15 years. Methods This is a cross-sectional analytical study conducted onnior high school students aged 13-15 years throughout June to August 2017. Participants are classified as athletes from particular sports and non-athletes. Assessment of pulmonary function was done using a spirometry test, in which each subject was asked to inhale and exhale in a particular method. Parameters assessed include vital capacity (VC), forced vital capacity (FVC), expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), forced expiratory flow (FEF) and FEV1/FVC. Differences in lung function between athletes and non-athletes were analyzed using independent T-test. Results There were 60 athletes and 60 non-athletes included in this study. The mean age of athletes and non-athletes were 13.38 (SD 0.99) years old and 13.70 (SD 0.76) years old, respectively. The statistically significant differences in mean lung function parameters between athletes and non-athletes were as follows: VC: 85.03% vs. 79.41%, respectively (P=0.035); FVC: 95.66% vs. 88.43%, respectively (P=0.016); FEV1: 102.10% vs. 94.28%, respectively (P=0.016); and FEV1/FVC: 105.95% vs. 102.69%, respectively (P=0.011). However, there were no statistically significant differences in the means of FEF 25-75% between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusions Parameters of lung function in athletes are in general significantly higher than in non-athletes.

show abstract

“…Exercise will make the durability and strength of respiratory muscles increase so that the lungs ability to expand also increases. Exercises help to improve respiratory muscle ability to overcome respiratory airflow resistance, which in turn increases air volume [16].…”

Section: B Differences Of Influence On High and Low Expiratory Peak mentioning

confidence: 99%

The Effects of Circuit and Fartlek Exercise Method and Peak Expiratory Flow on Vo2max

Pratama¹,

Kushartanti²

2018

Proceedings of the 2nd Yogyakarta International Seminar on Health, Physical Education, and Sport Science (YISHPESS 2018) and 1s

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

objective: (1) Differences between the effects of circuit and fartlek training method on VO2Max; (2) Differences between the effects of high and low peak expiratory flow on VO2Max; and (3) The interactions between circuit, fartlek exercise methods and peak expiratory flow (high and low) on VO2Max. 2 x 2 factorial method. Peak expiratory flow instruments: peak flow meter and VO2Max: multistage fitness test. ANAVA data analysis α = 0.05. Results. (1) There is a significant difference between the effects of circuit and fartlek exercise methods on VO2Max, p value = 0.022 < 0.05, which show that circuit training method is objectively better than fartlek training method. (2) There is a significant difference between the effects of high and low peak expiratory flow on VO2Max, p value = 0.000 < 0.05, students with high expiratory volume achive higher value than those with low expiratory volume. (3) There is a significant interaction between circuit and fartlek training method and (high and low) peak expiratory flow on VO2Max, p value = 0.000 < 0.05

show abstract

Difference in pulmonary function test among the athletic and sedentary population

Cited by 24 publications

References 12 publications

Vitamin D and Physical Activity

Vitamin D and Physical Activity

Lung function in athletes and non-athletes aged 13-15 years

The Effects of Circuit and Fartlek Exercise Method and Peak Expiratory Flow on Vo2max

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About