2022
DOI: 10.1186/s12711-022-00699-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in caecal microbiota composition and Salmonella carriage between experimentally infected inbred lines of chickens

Abstract: Background Salmonella Enteritidis (SE) is one of the major causes of human foodborne intoxication resulting from consumption of contaminated poultry products. Genetic selection of animals that are more resistant to Salmonella carriage and modulation of the gut microbiota are two promising ways to decrease individual Salmonella carriage. The aims of this study were to identify the main genetic and microbial factors that control the level of Salmonella carriage in chickens (Gallus gallus) under c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter genes code for the major histocompatibility complex I or II (MHCIBF2, MHCIYF5, MHCIIBLB1, MHCIIBLB2), antimicrobial peptides such as granzyme A and K, or the avian betadefensines 10, 13 and 14. In the same way, the genes TLR 1,2,4,7,15 [31][32][33][34], NOS2, Gal 13, PSAP and IGL, which have already been associated with SE resistance in a genetic study in chicken [13], were more expressed in the resistant line N. Interestingly, we showed previously that the caecal microbiota composition of these animals was highly different between individuals from lines N and 6 1 [30]. Do some of these DEGs in caecal tonsils indirectly impact Salmonella carriage through the modulation of the caecal microbiota composition?…”
Section: A Large Difference Of Gene Expression Between Linessupporting
confidence: 59%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The latter genes code for the major histocompatibility complex I or II (MHCIBF2, MHCIYF5, MHCIIBLB1, MHCIIBLB2), antimicrobial peptides such as granzyme A and K, or the avian betadefensines 10, 13 and 14. In the same way, the genes TLR 1,2,4,7,15 [31][32][33][34], NOS2, Gal 13, PSAP and IGL, which have already been associated with SE resistance in a genetic study in chicken [13], were more expressed in the resistant line N. Interestingly, we showed previously that the caecal microbiota composition of these animals was highly different between individuals from lines N and 6 1 [30]. Do some of these DEGs in caecal tonsils indirectly impact Salmonella carriage through the modulation of the caecal microbiota composition?…”
Section: A Large Difference Of Gene Expression Between Linessupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Results of the DEG and BP GO term enrichment analyses. Results of the 16S analysis from the study [30].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Tyzzerella 3 showed a fold change (Log 2 ) of -30, indicating that this genus is strongly associated with a reduction in fledging success. Tyzzerella 3 has previously been linked to diabetes ( Yue et al, 2019 ; Ma et al, 2020 ), cardiovascular diseases ( Kelly et al, 2016 ) and even reduced disease resistance in poultry ( Cazals et al, 2022 ). The abundance of Brachybacterium , Brevibacterium , Serratia , and Sphingomonas , was also negatively linked to fledging success.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%