2012
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037673
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in Rat Dorsal Striatal NMDA and AMPA Receptors following Acute and Repeated Cocaine-Induced Locomotor Activation

Abstract: Sprague-Dawley rats can be classified as low or high cocaine responders (LCRs or HCRs, respectively) based on their locomotor activity induced by an acute low dose of cocaine. Upon repeated cocaine exposure, LCRs display greater locomotor sensitization, reward, and reinforcement than HCRs. Altered glutamate receptor expression in the brain reward pathway has been linked to locomotor sensitization and addiction. To determine if such changes contribute to the differential development of locomotor sensitization, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following non-contingent administration of cocaine, the majority of evidence indicates that mRNA and protein levels of NMDARs in the nucleus accumbens are not changed in early abstinence (24 hrs or less), but are increased at weeks or longer intervals of abstinence from cocaine or following extinction of cocaine-seeking (Ghasemzadeh et al, 1999; Crespo et al, 2002; Ghasemzadeh et al, 2009; Schumann and Yaka, 2009; Yamamoto and Zahniser, 2012). Some studies, however, find that non-contingent cocaine administration decreases the expression of NMDAR subunits in the nucleus accumbens (Loftis and Janowsky, 2000; Le Greves et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following non-contingent administration of cocaine, the majority of evidence indicates that mRNA and protein levels of NMDARs in the nucleus accumbens are not changed in early abstinence (24 hrs or less), but are increased at weeks or longer intervals of abstinence from cocaine or following extinction of cocaine-seeking (Ghasemzadeh et al, 1999; Crespo et al, 2002; Ghasemzadeh et al, 2009; Schumann and Yaka, 2009; Yamamoto and Zahniser, 2012). Some studies, however, find that non-contingent cocaine administration decreases the expression of NMDAR subunits in the nucleus accumbens (Loftis and Janowsky, 2000; Le Greves et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cocaine-induced changes in NMDAR expression differ between brain areas, but are also highly sensitive to the choice of cocaine administration paradigm and the history of cocaine exposure. This is particularly evident in the nucleus accumbens (NAc), where short withdrawal (3 days or less) from experimenter-administered (non-contingent) cocaine is reported to decrease the NMDAR subunit levels or leave them unchanged (Yamaguchi et al, 2002; Yamamoto and Zahniser, 2012), whereas longer periods of withdrawal from non-contingent cocaine is associated with an increase in NMDAR subunit expression (Ghasemzadeh et al, 2009a, Schumann and Yaka, 2009; Zhang et al, 2007). This pattern of decreased to increased expression of NMDARs with abstinence from non-contingent cocaine is different for animals that are trained to self-administer cocaine.…”
Section: Cocaine Effects On Nmdar Expressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1996; Lu et al, 2003) with some studies reporting no effect of cocaine on NMDAR expression (Churchill, 1999; Yamamoto and Zahniser, 2012). Although these reports suggest some common themes in regulation of NMDAR subunit expression in the NAc and the VTA, they may not reflect changes in levels of functional NMDARs.…”
Section: Cocaine Effects On Nmdar Expressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition to the differential locomotor response after acute cocaine, Sprague-Dawley rats that are less activated initially (LCRs) more reliably develop locomotor sensitization than HCRs in response to repeated, intermittent cocaine exposure (Allen et al, 2007; Cass et al, 1993; Mandt et al, 2008, 2009; Nelson et al, 2009, 2010; Sabeti et al, 2003; Yamamoto and Zahniser, 2012). Importantly, we have observed similar results administering 10 mg/kg i.p.…”
Section: The Lcr/hcr Model Of Individual Differences To Cocainementioning
confidence: 99%