WE HAVE previously reported the results of a series of experiments in the cat concerning the interaction of acute relatively large bilateral epileptogenic foci in homologous areas of cerebral cortex1,2 (predominantly posterior sigmoid and suprasylvian gyri). In the intact animal, this interaction often resulted in the rapid production of persistent synchronous and symmetrical patterns of bilateral discharge including 21/2 to 31/2 cycles per second (cps) spike-slow wave complexes. Relevant behavioral concomitants of these bilateral discharges resembled some of the clinical phenomena observed in patients with idiopathic petit mal or grand mal seizures during similar bilater-$ al discharges: bilateral facial muscle and forelimb myoclonus, transient suspension or imperfect continuation of a repetitive act, and occasional generalized convulsive seizures.Investigations of the underlying anatomical pathways involved in this interaction of bilateral cortical foci indicated the significant role of the corpus callosum. Synchrony of bilateral discharge failed to occur after total section of corpus callosum. On the other hand, depth recordings indicated little involvement of medial thalamic structures.Moreover, the production of bilateral foci in preparations in whom all diencephalic, ros¬ tral mesencephalic, and most of dorsal hippocampal structures had been ablated did result in these synchronous patterns of bilat¬ eral discharge. A similar interaction occurred in preparations in which large bilateral blocks of cerebral cortex had been isolated from subcortical structures but remained connected by the corpus callosum.From a clinical standpoint, it is evident that the bilateral discharges of the patient with petit mal seizures are not equally dis¬ tributed throughout all recording areas over¬ lying cerebral cortex. Thus the "larval" bi¬ lateral discharges of spike and slow waves occur most prominently in frontal central areas.3 From an anatomical standpoint, it is evident that any conclusions based on the cat brain may not be entirely applicable to all areas of human cerebral cortex in view of (1) the marked evolution of neocortical areas.3 From an anatomical standpoint, it is evident that any conclusions based on the cat brain may not be entirely applicable to all areas of human cerebral cortex in view of (1) the marked evolution of neocortical areas, particularly frontal lobes in the pri¬ mates, (2) phylogenetic differences in callosal, cortical, and subcortical projections pathways of various neocortical areas,46 and (3) the regional differences in density of callosal pathways which occur in primates.5