2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2008.11.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential sensitivity to SSRI and tricyclic antidepressants in juvenile and adult mice of three strains

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
36
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
4
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Adolescent (P28 and P35) mice also respond to the anti-immobility effects of imipramine and DMI in the TST (Mason et al, 2009;Mitchell et al, 2013), and DMI reduces immobility time in the FST in adolescent (P28 and P30) rats (Pechnick et al, 2008;Reed et al, 2008). Our SERT1/1 mouse data agree with literature showing that adolescents (P28) are sensitive to the antidepressant-like effects of DMI .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Adolescent (P28 and P35) mice also respond to the anti-immobility effects of imipramine and DMI in the TST (Mason et al, 2009;Mitchell et al, 2013), and DMI reduces immobility time in the FST in adolescent (P28 and P30) rats (Pechnick et al, 2008;Reed et al, 2008). Our SERT1/1 mouse data agree with literature showing that adolescents (P28) are sensitive to the antidepressant-like effects of DMI .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The TCA imipramine, a NET and SERT blocker, is known to reduce immobility time of adolescent mice (P28 and P35) in the FST, an assay of antidepressant-like response (Bourin et al, 1998;David et al, 2001;Mason et al, 2009). Adolescent (P28 and P35) mice also respond to the anti-immobility effects of imipramine and DMI in the TST (Mason et al, 2009;Mitchell et al, 2013), and DMI reduces immobility time in the FST in adolescent (P28 and P30) rats (Pechnick et al, 2008;Reed et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This definition is arbitrary and cannot be used in any automated procedure of immobility evaluation. Other definition of immobility is based on some threshold values of animal's movements when an animal is judged to be immobile when the velocity of its center less than 2 cm/s (Crowley et al, 2004) or the intensity of movement of its paws less than 450 (Mason et al, 2009). Although these threshold definitions can be used for automation of the FST, they are not constructive because no biological or statistical ground for the threshold choice has been presented.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the existing automated version of the FST the immobility state was qualified by the horizontal velocity of the mouse center (Crowley et al, 2004) or by the intensity of the mouse paws movements (Mason et al, 2009). In the present study we proposed to qualify immobility state by mouse silhouette alteration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation