2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.124209
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential-steering based path tracking control and energy-saving torque distribution strategy of 6WID unmanned ground vehicle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on HC theory and hierarchical kinematic model [ 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 ], we propose a distributed unmanned ground vehicle coordination control strategy, which is divided into two layers. In the upper layer control, the upper layer kinematic model is used as the prediction model of MPC, and the solution problem of future control increment is converted to the optimal solution problem of quadratic programming by setting the optimal objective function and constraint conditions.…”
Section: Control Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on HC theory and hierarchical kinematic model [ 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 ], we propose a distributed unmanned ground vehicle coordination control strategy, which is divided into two layers. In the upper layer control, the upper layer kinematic model is used as the prediction model of MPC, and the solution problem of future control increment is converted to the optimal solution problem of quadratic programming by setting the optimal objective function and constraint conditions.…”
Section: Control Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, many researchers have proposed several control theories and methods, such as fuzzy control, sliding mode variable structure control (SMC), model predictive control (MPC) [ 9 ] reinforcement learning [ 10 ], and other algorithms. Ying adopts the fuzzy control method for the controller of 4MIDEV to generate optimal regenerative braking torque to improve safety and economy during vehicle deceleration [ 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although fuzzy control has strong robustness and does not need an accurate mathematical model, its simple fuzzy processing of information will lead to the reduction of system control accuracy and poor dynamic quality, and the stability of electric vehicles is an important factor to measure the dynamic performance of vehicles, so fuzzy control is not suitable for this study. Yue used a model-free adaptive sliding mode control in the upper controller to estimate the required yaw moment, and in the lower controller, Yue used the seeker optimization algorithm (SOA) for torque distribution, which ensured the stability and energy-saving characteristics of the vehicle [ 9 ]. Sliding mode control can overcome the uncertainty of the system, and has strong robustness to disturbance and modeling dynamics, especially for the control of nonlinear systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A PID (Proportion Integration Differentiation) algorithm can control the vehicle lateral error according to the trajectory deviation, but the adjustment of parameters under different working conditions is the disadvantage of the algorithm [3][4][5]. A linear quadratic regulator (LQR) takes into account the influence of the vehicle dynamics model, but requires higher accuracy of the vehicle model [6][7][8][9][10]. Lghani Menhour [11] proposed a mathematical driver model based on a two-degrees-of-freedom PID multi-controller, developed a mathematical driver model, and verified the robustness and stability of the control, which improved the control accuracy under the uncertainty of nonlinear and structured parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%