2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2012.11.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differentiation between the effect of temperature and pressure on radon within the subsurface geological media

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
36
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
4
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, although radon sensitivity to pressure has been documented (e.g. [59][60][61][62]), a number of studies both in experimental and field settings concluded that atmospheric pressure does not influence radon variability (e.g. [63][64][65][66][67]).…”
Section: Challenges and Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, although radon sensitivity to pressure has been documented (e.g. [59][60][61][62]), a number of studies both in experimental and field settings concluded that atmospheric pressure does not influence radon variability (e.g. [63][64][65][66][67]).…”
Section: Challenges and Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pores or micro-fissures in rocks are the tunnels through which radon is transported in the rock, and diffusion and seepage provide the main momentum for radon transport. The number, volume, and degree of openness and expansion of pores or micro-fissures are closely related to the geomechanical environment, such as underground water seepage fields, in-situ stress fields, ultrasonic vibration fields, low-vibration fields, and temperature fields [3][4][5]. However, the mechanisms of diffusion and seepage are influenced by internal and external factors, such as the pore structure, temperature and water content of the soil [6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the past few decades, long‐term radon monitoring has been conducted within geological media such as shallow soil, country rock, alluvial deposits, ground water, and hot springs and has revealed the following results: (1) A typical cyclical daily signature in radon temporal variability [ Lehmann et al , ; Martín‐Luis et al , ; Schubert and Schulz , ; Alparone et al , ; Fujiyoshi et al , ; Sundal et al , ; Choubey et al , ]: (2) longer radon signals, of several days [ Steinitz et al , ; Richon et al , ; Barbosa et al , ; Eff‐Darwich et al , ; Inan et al , ; Nikolopoulos et al , ]; and (3) long‐term seasonal patterns [ Perrier et al , ; Ghosh et al , ; Barbosa et al , ; Choubey et al , ; Richon et al , ; Zafrir et al , ; Martin‐Luis et al , ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a method was presented recently [ Zafrir et al , ] to differentiate between the impact of ambient temperature and pressure on radon transportation within subsurface porous media. The technique was based on simultaneous long‐term radon monitoring by alpha and gamma measurement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%