1992
DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.1992.tb08578.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diffuse type alteration of the ocular wall in different eye diseases

Abstract: The ocular wall dimensions (thickness and volume) were measured by means of ultrasonography in 61 eyes of 61 patients with different eye diseases and 31 eyes of 31 healthy subjects with or without refractive error. The results confirmed, that in spite of the great variance in the ocular wall thickness, depending on the axial eye length, the volume of the ocular coats is constant in healthy eyes (ca. 1.65 cm3). In patients with ocular hypotony (eyes after intraocular surgery or trauma, and eyes with uveitis or … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results showed that in the macular area the thickness of the retina and all intraretinal layers, except for the RNFL, GCC and the RPE, correlated with AL with an increasing trend towards the outer layers in the peripheral ring which suggests that the outer layers are elongating or “stretching” with increasing eyeball length. Since the OCT examination was carried out in the macula in a limited, 6 mm diameter wide retinal area, we did not have the opportunity to measure the total volume of the retinal layers involving the entire retina to the ora serrata and thus we were not able to get comparable results to those published by Németh et al using ultrasound [ 4 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results showed that in the macular area the thickness of the retina and all intraretinal layers, except for the RNFL, GCC and the RPE, correlated with AL with an increasing trend towards the outer layers in the peripheral ring which suggests that the outer layers are elongating or “stretching” with increasing eyeball length. Since the OCT examination was carried out in the macula in a limited, 6 mm diameter wide retinal area, we did not have the opportunity to measure the total volume of the retinal layers involving the entire retina to the ora serrata and thus we were not able to get comparable results to those published by Németh et al using ultrasound [ 4 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The first paper describing the measurement of the ocular coat dimensions using US and the correlation between the thickness of the ocular wall and AL was published in 1984 [ 3 ]. Eight years later, Németh et al showed that the volume of the ocular coats is nearly constant in healthy eyes; furthermore, their results confirmed that the thickness of the ocular wall correlates negatively with the AL of the eye [ 4 ]. On the other hand, in eyes with uveitis, hypotonia or exophthalmus, the thickness and volume of the ocular wall were increased, as a result of the edema, while in eyes with glaucoma both the thickness and volume of the ocular wall were decreased, probably as a consequence of the destruction of the ganglion cells [ 4 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various studies have indicated that subfoveal ChT is influenced by factors such as age, race, sex, axial length, and intraocular pressure 4 , 5 . Similarly, a correlation between retinal thickness and refractive error has been found that retinal thickness decreases with increased myopia degree and axial length enlongation 6 , 7 . This relationship is also reflected in different layers of the retina, such as the ganglion cell complex (GCC) and ganglion cell inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) 8 , 9 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The complex interaction of all factors affects the signal strength, which is the main indicator of image quality during the study [ 3 , 4 , 5 ]. Despite good image quality and high signal strength, we still obtain images with less relevant diagnostic data, especially in relation to RNFL and GCL thickness [ 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 ]. This issue is increasingly addressed in the literature, especially the role of axial length, refraction, sex, age and other factors [ 5 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%