1985
DOI: 10.1093/jn/115.1.93
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digestibility of Native and Modified Starches: In Vitro Studies with Human and Rabbit Pancreatic Amylases and In Vivo Studies in Rabbits

Abstract: The effects of cooking and chemical modification of purified starches on the relative rates and extent of their hydrolysis were studied in vitro by using purified human and rabbit pancreatic amylases. Comparison was made with an in vivo study of postprandial glucose and insulin response in adult rabbits. Uncooked starches showed negligible hydrolysis in vitro, whereas cooking (10 min, 100 degrees C) increased both the rate and extent of hydrolysis of all starches. Soluble potato starch was the most and potato … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
5

Year Published

1988
1988
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
15
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, in vitro experiment involves the interaction of only the substrate and purified enzymes and the entire sample is incubated with an optimized cocktail at time 0 . In contrast, the in vivo digestion is a dynamic process that involves animal variation, chewing, bowel movement and other enzymes such as salivary amylases and glucose carriers Giuberti, Gallo and Masoero (Lee et al, 1985;Weurding et al, 2001;Hasjim et al, 2010). Moreover, the lack both in the simulation of the effect of diets on passage rate and viscosity and in the removal of digestion products foreseen for the in vitro analyses could further explain these differences (Weurding et al, 2001).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, in vitro experiment involves the interaction of only the substrate and purified enzymes and the entire sample is incubated with an optimized cocktail at time 0 . In contrast, the in vivo digestion is a dynamic process that involves animal variation, chewing, bowel movement and other enzymes such as salivary amylases and glucose carriers Giuberti, Gallo and Masoero (Lee et al, 1985;Weurding et al, 2001;Hasjim et al, 2010). Moreover, the lack both in the simulation of the effect of diets on passage rate and viscosity and in the removal of digestion products foreseen for the in vitro analyses could further explain these differences (Weurding et al, 2001).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No entanto, fatores intrín-secos aos alimentos podem justificar as pequenas, mas significativas, diferenças observadas neste estudo, como, por exemplo, a encapsulação celular do endosperma, processo de moagem, resistência propiciada pelo conteúdo de água entre os polímeros de glicose, forma de distribuição da amilose no grão de milho, menor penetração de água e exposição do sítio de hidrólise da forma vítrea da amilose em relação à forma amorfa da amilopectina, a gelatinização do amido e sua posterior agregação com a parede celular e proteínas, além da reação de Maillard promovida pelo excesso de calor na peletização das rações, entre outros, que concorrem para diferenças na digestibilidade total da fração amilácea das rações (Lee et al, 1985;Rooney & Pflugfelder, 1986;Gidenne & Perez, 1993 a,b;Penz Jr., 1998;Arruda et al, 2000).…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…Adicionalmente, considerando-se a característi-ca do amido de cereais em possuir maior proporção de amilopectina que amilose (GREENWOOD, 1970) e o fato de as propriedades estruturais do grânulo de amido influenciarem a taxa de hidrólise pela amilase pancreática de coelhos (LEE et al, 1985; GIDENNE e PEREZ, 1993a), pressupõe-se que a maior proporção de amido de milho em relação ao milho grão pode ter sido determinante para a relativa eficiência diges-tiva observada neste estudo.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified