2020
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2012.12264
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digital Annealer for quadratic unconstrained binary optimization: a comparative performance analysis

Abstract: Digital Annealer (DA) is a computer architecture designed for tackling combinatorial optimization problems formulated as quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) models. In this paper, we present the results of an extensive computational study to evaluate the performance of DA in a systematic way in comparison to multiple state-of-the-art solvers for different problem classes. We examine pure QUBO models, as well as QUBO reformulations of three constrained problems, namely quadratic assignment, quadr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They are NP-hard problems [17], [18]. It has been reported that existing Isingmachine hardware is unable to provide even a near-optimal solution of them [32], [33]. Section 5.2 shows the assignment process of {m i } and {s i } for each combinatorial optimization problem.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are NP-hard problems [17], [18]. It has been reported that existing Isingmachine hardware is unable to provide even a near-optimal solution of them [32], [33]. Section 5.2 shows the assignment process of {m i } and {s i } for each combinatorial optimization problem.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a benchmark problem, we consider the bi-objective Quadratic Assignment Problem (QAP). The DA has been shown to present competitive performance on single-objective QAP instances [Şeker et al, 2020b[Şeker et al, , Matsubara et al, 2020. In [Matsubara et al, 2020], the DA was able to solve QAPLIB [Burkard et al, 1997] instances to optimality up to 165,000 times faster than CPLEX.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%