2018
DOI: 10.1080/14680777.2018.1468348
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digital media responses to a feminist scholarly article: a critical discourse analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study's analysis suggested trolling strategies were prominent in the corpus used to silence the author. With critical discourse analysis, the study states that this is proof of academics' opposition to feminist works (Parson, 2019).…”
Section: Critical Discourse Analysis In Current Educational Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The study's analysis suggested trolling strategies were prominent in the corpus used to silence the author. With critical discourse analysis, the study states that this is proof of academics' opposition to feminist works (Parson, 2019).…”
Section: Critical Discourse Analysis In Current Educational Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Like most studies, the CDA study found that the existing approach is still dominantly teacherfacilitated approach, which is a progress from initial teacher-centred approaches. With a much more personal approach, Parson (2019) identified the linguistic tools used in people's responses toward the author's previous article on gendered discourse. The study's analysis suggested trolling strategies were prominent in the corpus used to silence the author.…”
Section: Critical Discourse Analysis In Current Educational Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drawing particularly on Goffman's use of the term, discursive approaches often also invoke the notion of 'frame' when studying online forums, which, in this context means something like "An ideological construct made up of culturally shared ideas that people invoke to legitimise and make sense of the activity they are accomplishing" (Del-teso-craviotto 2006: 468). Some of the topics that have been commonly studied through discourse studies include harassment (Parson, 2018), particularly gender harassment (Rodríguez-Darias and Aguilera-Ávila, 2017), and the ways that publics engage with media discourse (Pinto-Coelho et al, 2017).…”
Section: The Discursive Turnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stance is categorized as affective, evaluative/judgement, or epistemic (Strauss & Feiz, 2013). Exploring the use of stance perspective on how language is used to create an emotional response from readers, assert the validity of claims, and to define truth and knowledge (Parson, 2018). Stance is conveyed through the use of modal verbs (e.g., "must," "should," "may," "can) to convey knowledge, obligation, and permission (Afros & Schryer;2009), words that convey ways of knowing, and words that create emphasis or emotion.…”
Section: Stancementioning
confidence: 99%