1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-9317(96)00184-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digital Pattern Generator for polynomially bordered shape primitives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A new digital pattern generator for fast generation of shape primitives was developed and built, 6 and connected to the microscope to produce the deflection signals. A new digital pattern generator for fast generation of shape primitives was developed and built, 6 and connected to the microscope to produce the deflection signals.…”
Section: Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A new digital pattern generator for fast generation of shape primitives was developed and built, 6 and connected to the microscope to produce the deflection signals. A new digital pattern generator for fast generation of shape primitives was developed and built, 6 and connected to the microscope to produce the deflection signals.…”
Section: Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The starting material in our experiments was a SOI wafer with a 36 nm top silicon layer on 400 nm buried oxide. In order to fabricate the initial Si dots, samples were spincoated with 70 nm thick PMMA which was then patterned by 30 kV electron beam lithography using a Philips XL30 FEG scanning electron microscope with a home-built pattern generator [9]. Dots with different diameters were realized using point exposures with different doses ranging from 9 to 90 pC.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to fabricate the initial Si dots, samples were spincoated with 70 nm thick PMMA which was then patterned by 30 kV electron beam lithography using a Philips XL30 FEG scanning electron microscope with a home-built pattern generator [9]. Dots with different diameters were realized using point exposures with different doses ranging from 9 to 90 pC.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%