2019 2nd IEEE International Conference on Soft Robotics (RoboSoft) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/robosoft.2019.8722816
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dimension Optimization of Pneumatically Actuated Soft Continuum Manipulators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When the friction between the tip and a wall is not small, the friction acts in the direction to prevent falling. Therefore, the actual growing length does not become smaller than L estimated by (9). Thus, predicting the maximum height after pitch-axis bending using this model is helpful when a user navigates the robot in real applications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When the friction between the tip and a wall is not small, the friction acts in the direction to prevent falling. Therefore, the actual growing length does not become smaller than L estimated by (9). Thus, predicting the maximum height after pitch-axis bending using this model is helpful when a user navigates the robot in real applications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, results fall far short of the length of Fichter's model (4) (dotted line). The broken line represents the original model(9).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The material of the soft robotic arm was Elastomer M4601 (Wacker Inc.) with a density of 3 1.2 / g cm [19]. Yeoh second-order model of the superelastomer constitutive model was adopted and material was isotropic with the model function of…”
Section: Parameters and Materials Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One single-cavity structure can bend to a fixed direction after the cavity is filled with certain air pressure and only suit for the task requirements of bending in fixed direction [12,13], such as wearable gloves [14][15][16]. For meeting more work requirements and accomplishing bend in multiple directions, twocavity structure [17] and three-cavity structure [18][19][20] of soft robotic arms appeared. Soft robotic arms with these structures can bend in different directions by controlling pressure to one or more cavities to produce the desired bending effect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, this adds significant procedural complexity that is amplified as the device scale is reduced. Generally, multi-chamber actuators employ three chambers distributed with their centers 120° apart (Suzumori et al, 1991a , b ; Benjamin et al, 2012 ; Cianchetti et al, 2013 ; Martinez et al, 2013 ; Yahya et al, 2014 ; Sun et al, 2016 ; Yan et al, 2016 ; Drotman et al, 2017 ; Nguyen et al, 2017 ; Robertson and Paik, 2017 ) and may be fabricated in a number of ways; for example: (i) molding with constant axial cross-sectional cores (Suzumori et al, 1997 ; Martinez et al, 2013 ; Yahya et al, 2014 ; Fu et al, 2020 ); (ii) assembly of pre-formed individual chambers (Cianchetti et al, 2013 ; Matteo et al, 2014 ; Ranzani et al, 2015 ; Nguyen et al, 2017 ; Garbin et al, 2018 , 2019 ; Peng et al, 2019 ); and (iii) 3D-printing of integrated designs (Peele et al, 2015 ; Wallin et al, 2018 ; Yirmibesoglu et al, 2018 ; Drotman et al, 2019 ). Although promising, these methods carry trade-offs between achievable internal chamber geometry, complexity, resilience of assembly, material selection, and practicable actuator scale and feature resolution (Schmitt et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%